Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Yet another FTR (horseman) thread
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2872453, member: 19463"]Odd, I disagree with that old fool all the time. In this case, on page 454, the note to RIC 81 and 82 specifies that these numbers sometimes show the R-E break but you will note that they do not assign a different number to these differences so I don't consider that differentiating between them. That would have required a number like 82a and record which officinae had been observed with the different split. I am all for separations in catalogs that recognize a difference that was done for some reason but not one that was a matter of running out of space on a die and sliding one letter to the other side. RIC is famous for inconsistency when it comes to recording little differences in some cases but not others and usually fails to explain why they felt one variation was significant and another was not. If, for example, we were to find that the legend shift was made when Constans died, the variation would merit a new number. If all coins of a certain officina were one way, we should separate them but here we have shown an IA each way. There are a million details to be studied on these coins and I most certainly agree that Randy should be the one to do all this study. He is a lot closer to the age that will have a ghost of a chance of making a difference. If I were in charge of assigning responsibility, I'd prefer Martin get busy straightening out the mess we call Eastern Septimius. A serious problem we have in the hobby is that the number of interesting topics that need to be explored is greater than the serious students willing to put the work into it. Most I know have more than one interest and may not reach the end of all those studies. In 1997, I started my web pages with two: one was Eastern Septimius and the other was a Falling Horseman. In a few years I had learned a lot about several other topics but pretty much nothing new about Septimius. We need specialists dedicated to figuring out things that were not known in the 20th century and before.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2872453, member: 19463"]Odd, I disagree with that old fool all the time. In this case, on page 454, the note to RIC 81 and 82 specifies that these numbers sometimes show the R-E break but you will note that they do not assign a different number to these differences so I don't consider that differentiating between them. That would have required a number like 82a and record which officinae had been observed with the different split. I am all for separations in catalogs that recognize a difference that was done for some reason but not one that was a matter of running out of space on a die and sliding one letter to the other side. RIC is famous for inconsistency when it comes to recording little differences in some cases but not others and usually fails to explain why they felt one variation was significant and another was not. If, for example, we were to find that the legend shift was made when Constans died, the variation would merit a new number. If all coins of a certain officina were one way, we should separate them but here we have shown an IA each way. There are a million details to be studied on these coins and I most certainly agree that Randy should be the one to do all this study. He is a lot closer to the age that will have a ghost of a chance of making a difference. If I were in charge of assigning responsibility, I'd prefer Martin get busy straightening out the mess we call Eastern Septimius. A serious problem we have in the hobby is that the number of interesting topics that need to be explored is greater than the serious students willing to put the work into it. Most I know have more than one interest and may not reach the end of all those studies. In 1997, I started my web pages with two: one was Eastern Septimius and the other was a Falling Horseman. In a few years I had learned a lot about several other topics but pretty much nothing new about Septimius. We need specialists dedicated to figuring out things that were not known in the 20th century and before.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Yet another FTR (horseman) thread
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...