Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Andy, post: 40464, member: 645&quot;]No. It probably is best on third world countries as a means of communicating who is currently in charge&quot;. cdb1950.&nbsp;&nbsp; Lol<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;There is no right or wrong in a discussion like this - there is only opinion.&quot;&nbsp; GD.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yes I agree GD however, my opinion is &quot;more&quot; correct of course.....like that hasn&#039;t been said before. But still true in my case.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now for the survey, I say no to the Presidents. I don&#039;t see anything to gain from a president series. The State Quarters had something to teach in regards to geography and sorry Jody but it also reinforced the idea of the Republic, many states one nation. Where are you anyway?&nbsp; </p><p>But what use would a presidential series be? Their is an old saying that this nation survives being a democracy despite our presidents for there is always at least 45% of the nation that disagrees with whoever is in charge and besides our nation is not about The CEO of the company but what our company stands for and what it produces. Which is mainly the idea of democracy. So lets have an image of a hot babe with long legs and flowing hair strutting with a wink in her eye. Now that would look alot better then a Truman or a Reagan coin, who I both respect but wouldn&#039;t want to carry around in my pants pocket.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in