Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
XTREME COIN MAKEOVER - Horribly Misidentified Trajan
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="hotwheelsearl, post: 7333625, member: 75143"]So I got this silver coin from eBay for like $11.</p><p>Let me preface this by saying that this coin was actually purchased from a <i>known fake seller, </i>'holdingancienthistory.' This is the same seller that I purchased the fake Vespasian NEP RED coin from.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, for the price I was willing to chance it. If it turned out fake, I could always return it, so there I went.</p><p><br /></p><p>The flip was <i>atrocious</i>. This seller appears to know little to nothing about ancient coins; that or he was faced with a box of coins and a box of flips, and just mixed them together.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1280804[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>There are several problems:</p><p>1. coin is not Rome mint. Find me a Rome mint coin that uses Greek letters.</p><p>2. Pax standing with.....cat? gato (spanish for cat)? what? I really don't think cats feature prominently on any ancient coins.</p><p>3. Where's the attribution? How do you get R-4 without knowing what is it?</p><p>4. $100? How can you price a coin with no attribution?</p><p><br /></p><p>On the bright side, the diam, weight, and composition are correct.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyways, coin showed up encrusted to death which is why I thought it was more likely than not authentic.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1280805[/ATTACH] </p><p>The surfaces had obviously been worked on, with the excessive scratches. I believe that it was first entirely encrusted, then someone ground down the outer layer to see what it was.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1280806[/ATTACH] </p><p>There were green, black, brown, and red-orange mineral encrustations.</p><p><br /></p><p>I knew this could either be a great success or a miserable failure.</p><p><br /></p><p>I subjected it to a veritable <i>gauntlet</i> of chemicals:</p><p>sodium hydroxide, acetic acid, citric acid, sodium thiosulfate, and at one point I even splashed some <i>gosh-darn Tarn-X </i>on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyways, after over a week of abuse, I end up with this rather more attractive, and most importantly, genuine <i>drachm</i> of<i> Caesaria/Bostra/Cappadocia</i>, with <i>Arabia</i>, not Pax with a <i>camel</i>, not a <i>cat</i>.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1280808[/ATTACH] </p><p>Trajan AR Drachm</p><p>19mm, 3.1g</p><p>AYTOKΡ KAIC NEΡ TΡAIANO CEB ΓEΡM ΔAK</p><p>ΔHMAΡX EΞIH UΠAT IZ</p><p>Syd 185 (may be a different one due to different regnal year, but closest I'll get)</p><p><br /></p><p>Although I don't think the coin is the $100 coin it says on the flip, it sure as heck is worth more than $11 now, IMO.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="hotwheelsearl, post: 7333625, member: 75143"]So I got this silver coin from eBay for like $11. Let me preface this by saying that this coin was actually purchased from a [I]known fake seller, [/I]'holdingancienthistory.' This is the same seller that I purchased the fake Vespasian NEP RED coin from. However, for the price I was willing to chance it. If it turned out fake, I could always return it, so there I went. The flip was [I]atrocious[/I]. This seller appears to know little to nothing about ancient coins; that or he was faced with a box of coins and a box of flips, and just mixed them together. [ATTACH=full]1280804[/ATTACH] There are several problems: 1. coin is not Rome mint. Find me a Rome mint coin that uses Greek letters. 2. Pax standing with.....cat? gato (spanish for cat)? what? I really don't think cats feature prominently on any ancient coins. 3. Where's the attribution? How do you get R-4 without knowing what is it? 4. $100? How can you price a coin with no attribution? On the bright side, the diam, weight, and composition are correct. Anyways, coin showed up encrusted to death which is why I thought it was more likely than not authentic. [ATTACH=full]1280805[/ATTACH] The surfaces had obviously been worked on, with the excessive scratches. I believe that it was first entirely encrusted, then someone ground down the outer layer to see what it was. [ATTACH=full]1280806[/ATTACH] There were green, black, brown, and red-orange mineral encrustations. I knew this could either be a great success or a miserable failure. I subjected it to a veritable [I]gauntlet[/I] of chemicals: sodium hydroxide, acetic acid, citric acid, sodium thiosulfate, and at one point I even splashed some [I]gosh-darn Tarn-X [/I]on it. Anyways, after over a week of abuse, I end up with this rather more attractive, and most importantly, genuine [I]drachm[/I] of[I] Caesaria/Bostra/Cappadocia[/I], with [I]Arabia[/I], not Pax with a [I]camel[/I], not a [I]cat[/I]. [ATTACH=full]1280808[/ATTACH] Trajan AR Drachm 19mm, 3.1g AYTOKΡ KAIC NEΡ TΡAIANO CEB ΓEΡM ΔAK ΔHMAΡX EΞIH UΠAT IZ Syd 185 (may be a different one due to different regnal year, but closest I'll get) Although I don't think the coin is the $100 coin it says on the flip, it sure as heck is worth more than $11 now, IMO.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
XTREME COIN MAKEOVER - Horribly Misidentified Trajan
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...