Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Collect89, post: 472506, member: 15445&quot;]<b>I say 62/63</b></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: black"><font face="Verdana">I was going to tell you my opinion of the <u>photo</u> was an AU58.&nbsp; The up-close photo makes the cheek look like it has wear &amp; rub beyond the threshold of calling it UNC.&nbsp; However, looking at the slab photo, it looks like the cheek is NOT thumbed or circulated.&nbsp; It looks more like contact marks (not circulation).&nbsp;&nbsp; TPGs are usually VERY critical on any marks on Barber cheeks.&nbsp; I say 62/63. </font></span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: black"><font face="Verdana">62 is because of the contact marks on the cheek.&nbsp; It could go 63 because of superior eye appeal (and my personal favorite album toning).</font></span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: black"><font face="Verdana">64 is unfair to so many other Barbers graded by NGC &amp; PCGS.</font></span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: black"><font face="Verdana">GDJMSP- Can you explain a little about bumping it up because of the rarity of the coin?&nbsp;&nbsp; </font></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in