Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Wrong Assumptions: Maurice Tiberius Decanummium from Constantine in Numidia
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3605041, member: 85693"]Well, I'm note sure "clear" is quite what they are - the pellet on the left is fairly visible. The one on the right is somewhat obscured by a patina booger (not a technical term <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />). </p><p><br /></p><p>The Constantinople 498A is still a possibility - I had not noticed the 2 stars, no officiana type from Constantinople - and I thank you for pointing it out. </p><p><br /></p><p>It does seem the Constantinople decanummiums are fairly crude compared to the Numidia ones I looked at (and mine). The Numidia examples I saw were on nice round flans with respectable edges. In comparison, the Constantinople ones look horrible (498 with the officinal is pretty common, I think) - but I could only find one 498A - on Coin Archives:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]965110[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1454853&AucID=2994&Lot=335&Val=e9b398bde29f444ff67de76eb5fef50e" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1454853&AucID=2994&Lot=335&Val=e9b398bde29f444ff67de76eb5fef50e" rel="nofollow">https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1454853&AucID=2994&Lot=335&Val=e9b398bde29f444ff67de76eb5fef50e</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3605041, member: 85693"]Well, I'm note sure "clear" is quite what they are - the pellet on the left is fairly visible. The one on the right is somewhat obscured by a patina booger (not a technical term :angelic:). The Constantinople 498A is still a possibility - I had not noticed the 2 stars, no officiana type from Constantinople - and I thank you for pointing it out. It does seem the Constantinople decanummiums are fairly crude compared to the Numidia ones I looked at (and mine). The Numidia examples I saw were on nice round flans with respectable edges. In comparison, the Constantinople ones look horrible (498 with the officinal is pretty common, I think) - but I could only find one 498A - on Coin Archives: [ATTACH=full]965110[/ATTACH] [URL]https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1454853&AucID=2994&Lot=335&Val=e9b398bde29f444ff67de76eb5fef50e[/URL][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Wrong Assumptions: Maurice Tiberius Decanummium from Constantine in Numidia
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...