Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mac McDonald, post: 8349986, member: 117420&quot;]Yes and no.&nbsp; For truly &quot;details&quot; coins...and there are some...indeed should be more to the what/where it is, as applicable.&nbsp; But IMO there are far too many &quot;details&quot; coins in the first place...nice, legitimate coins with either random marks as to be expected over 100-200 years, etc, or nary anything detectable or so minor it&#039;s laughable (cryable) that should be straight net-graded. If the mark(s) is so obvious as to be grafitti or deliberate abuse/altering of the coin&#039;s devices and/or script, then &quot;details&quot; may be appropriate.&nbsp; But NOT as it is today...way over-the-top knit-picky and ridiculous like the Walking Liberty half example and so many others.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in