Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Would you gamble on this?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SuperDave, post: 2386318, member: 1892"]<b>Nobody</b> can make much of a physical improvement on poor imagery - the "Enhance" button is only for television crime shows - but one advantage to having shot forty bazillion images of your own on a deliberate learning curve, and looking at a thousand images a week from others, is that you learn you <i>interpret</i> those poor images to a more accurate degree than a less-experienced onlooker. You reach the point where White Balance failures tend to correct themselves subconsciously, and can often discern the difference between pixelation from subpar camera sensors/small images and genuine coin features (or <i>the lack thereof</i>, which is the important part).</p><p><br /></p><p>And I'll say again, there is no reason why anyone whose budget allows for an occasional MS65 Morgan or similar cannot acquire both the equipment and skill to become a professional-level coin photographer. $500 tops - if you're willing to buy used - to be one of those folks whose images inspire jealousy. </p><p><br /></p><p>There is no such thing as a free lunch. You get better at interpreting digital imagery the same way you get better at grading - <b>experience</b>. The benefit of having viewed <i>every single new US coin thread for ten years </i>at a thriving coin forum, as well as the other fora I've participated at during the same period - not only for the images contained therein but for the <i>feedback from others viewing and offering opinion</i> (<b>extremely</b> important, as long as you know that you're not infallible and are therefore always willing to be wrong, and learn) - is that I now have probably as much <b>experience</b> as anyone, anywhere, at interpreting coin photography at all levels of skill. It's a slow week when I don't devote at least 25-30 hours to this stuff, and I don't have more than a couple slow weeks a year, and I've been doing it for more than a decade. It's an all-consuming passion for me, the place where I've chosen to leave my mark on the world.</p><p><br /></p><p><i>That's</i> why I speak with such confidence about coins viewed only from imagery. And I'm probably correct - within the tolerances of the image quality offered - 90 times out of 100. Unfortunately, it's those other 10 times I get remembered for, because they're usually doozies. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SuperDave, post: 2386318, member: 1892"][B]Nobody[/B] can make much of a physical improvement on poor imagery - the "Enhance" button is only for television crime shows - but one advantage to having shot forty bazillion images of your own on a deliberate learning curve, and looking at a thousand images a week from others, is that you learn you [I]interpret[/I] those poor images to a more accurate degree than a less-experienced onlooker. You reach the point where White Balance failures tend to correct themselves subconsciously, and can often discern the difference between pixelation from subpar camera sensors/small images and genuine coin features (or [I]the lack thereof[/I], which is the important part). And I'll say again, there is no reason why anyone whose budget allows for an occasional MS65 Morgan or similar cannot acquire both the equipment and skill to become a professional-level coin photographer. $500 tops - if you're willing to buy used - to be one of those folks whose images inspire jealousy. There is no such thing as a free lunch. You get better at interpreting digital imagery the same way you get better at grading - [B]experience[/B]. The benefit of having viewed [I]every single new US coin thread for ten years [/I]at a thriving coin forum, as well as the other fora I've participated at during the same period - not only for the images contained therein but for the [I]feedback from others viewing and offering opinion[/I] ([B]extremely[/B] important, as long as you know that you're not infallible and are therefore always willing to be wrong, and learn) - is that I now have probably as much [B]experience[/B] as anyone, anywhere, at interpreting coin photography at all levels of skill. It's a slow week when I don't devote at least 25-30 hours to this stuff, and I don't have more than a couple slow weeks a year, and I've been doing it for more than a decade. It's an all-consuming passion for me, the place where I've chosen to leave my mark on the world. [I]That's[/I] why I speak with such confidence about coins viewed only from imagery. And I'm probably correct - within the tolerances of the image quality offered - 90 times out of 100. Unfortunately, it's those other 10 times I get remembered for, because they're usually doozies. :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Would you gamble on this?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...