Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1017510, member: 15309&quot;]I find the coin attractive as well as the toning.&nbsp; The Walker series is tough to find with attractive rainbow toning and although the toning on this coin is far from monster, it is rather nice for the series.&nbsp; Disruptek&#039;s photos are obviously designed to show the color of the coin.&nbsp; My guess is that tilted under a light at the right angle, the photo is spot on.&nbsp; Heritage&#039;s photo is a straight on shot which is probably a more accurate representation of the coin in most conditions.&nbsp; Ironically, I think the combination of both sets of photos makes the coin even more desirable than either photo by itself.&nbsp; The luster looks better in the Heritage photos and that is a major factor in an MS67 coin.&nbsp; With only the Disruptek photo, I would have been concerned about the luster on the coin.&nbsp; However, this is still a coin I would like to see in hand before purchasing.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think Mark is right about the motive of the previous owner.&nbsp; It seems clear that the crossover was an attempt to upgrade the coin from PCGS MS67 CAC to NGC MS68.&nbsp; The owner may have also been hoping for a star designation based on the toning.&nbsp; This coin is a registry level coin and the star designation which is rare on Walkers would have been a selling point since coins with star designations get a point bump in the NGC registry.&nbsp; IMO, the coin does not deserve a star designation based on either set of photos.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have a walker that looks very much like the coin in question.&nbsp; Maybe I can find the photo later an post it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in