Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Would this $2 bill be considered a radar?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 1153096, member: 11668"]Right...but that particular book does have an unfortunate number of typos. (For example, on that page, the second instance of SEP 96 should be OCT 96, and the second instance of OCT 96 should be NOV 96. And there's no such thing as a 1993 $2, so the comment about mules doesn't make sense either...it belongs with the 1995 <b>$1</b>'s, probably.)</p><p> </p><p>Azpiazu's listings of uncut sheet serials appear to be the highest and lowest numbers he's observed--he doesn't appear to have made any attempt to use the plate positions to work out estimated serial ranges for each printing. Observed sheets from the 1995 $2 F..B block have skips of 100,000 serials between positions (far the largest skip for any of the modern uncut sheets, BTW), so counting forward and back from the note in the original post, its sheet would have ranged from A1 F96069317B to H4 F99169317B. The overall range for the run looks to be 96000001-99200000, with a small amount of uncertainty at each end.</p><p> </p><p>Every other 1995 $2 sheet block used a serial range that appears to end very close to 99999999. So I've long suspected that there might be a second printing of F..B sheets, using some of the 800,000 remaining serials in the range above 99200000. But so far I've never seen a sheet or a note that could belong to such a printing. It's *possible* that the F99670697B listed in Azpiazu's book is such a note--but given the number of typos in the book, I think a typo seems the likelier explanation. I'm still keeping a lookout for evidence of a higher-numbered F..B printing, but at this point I'm ready to conclude that it probably doesn't exist. Sometimes the BEP just numbers one uncut sheet printing in a different way than all the others, just because.... <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 1153096, member: 11668"]Right...but that particular book does have an unfortunate number of typos. (For example, on that page, the second instance of SEP 96 should be OCT 96, and the second instance of OCT 96 should be NOV 96. And there's no such thing as a 1993 $2, so the comment about mules doesn't make sense either...it belongs with the 1995 [B]$1[/B]'s, probably.) Azpiazu's listings of uncut sheet serials appear to be the highest and lowest numbers he's observed--he doesn't appear to have made any attempt to use the plate positions to work out estimated serial ranges for each printing. Observed sheets from the 1995 $2 F..B block have skips of 100,000 serials between positions (far the largest skip for any of the modern uncut sheets, BTW), so counting forward and back from the note in the original post, its sheet would have ranged from A1 F96069317B to H4 F99169317B. The overall range for the run looks to be 96000001-99200000, with a small amount of uncertainty at each end. Every other 1995 $2 sheet block used a serial range that appears to end very close to 99999999. So I've long suspected that there might be a second printing of F..B sheets, using some of the 800,000 remaining serials in the range above 99200000. But so far I've never seen a sheet or a note that could belong to such a printing. It's *possible* that the F99670697B listed in Azpiazu's book is such a note--but given the number of typos in the book, I think a typo seems the likelier explanation. I'm still keeping a lookout for evidence of a higher-numbered F..B printing, but at this point I'm ready to conclude that it probably doesn't exist. Sometimes the BEP just numbers one uncut sheet printing in a different way than all the others, just because.... :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Would this $2 bill be considered a radar?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...