Would the Forum Experts please comment on these two coin

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by nohope587, Oct 11, 2007.

  1. nohope587

    nohope587 Senior Member

    There is a story behind these two coins that I will elaborate on at a later date.
    Some of you may already know it
    I would welcome comments about grades and or anything you might want to say in
    general about these two coins.

    Once again thank you for taking time out of your busy day.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    no hope:
    Well, the 1864 is a large motto.
    Hard to tell for sure, but the 1865 may be a repunched date, look between the 8 & the 6.

    Nice coins, I am sure that others will disagree, but they may unc.
     
  4. nohope587

    nohope587 Senior Member

    Treashunt
    Its a fancy 5 variety the mark you can see is a die crack that runs from the bottom of the 1 to the mid point of the 5 its an indicator of a specific variety of fancy 5
     
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    sure, but I was sure that you knew that, about the fancy 5.
     
  6. nohope587

    nohope587 Senior Member

    Its part of the reason I am asking everyone to look at these two coins. I want to see what others see in them. I am more than happy that you saw something in the date..
     
  7. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    To me, it looks like the 1864 was cleaned a long time ago. Could be wrong though.
    Guy~
     
  8. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Well I am no expert but what I do know is that I like them a lot :bow:
     
  9. mike98024

    mike98024 Senior Member

    Great coins! There is nothing like seasoned copper with that mottled toning to give me a case of "the wants". The 1864 does appear to have cleaning marks over the leaves on the right side, but I suppose it is possible that the planchet had striations running throught it prior to the strike. In any case, I would call them unc. Are you sure the 1865 is not a repunched date? Congrats on some fine coins!
     
  10. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    <------------------ hardly a forum expert, but

    Frank:

    I for one, agree, those coins are unc or at worst lightly rubbed (way back then) and then toned over the next 100 years or so. If those grade lower than 58, I will eat my hat.
     
  11. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    No matter what, those are some nice coins. I've said it before, but any time you can find one with the "WE" intact, it's a great find.
    Guy~
     
  12. WoodenSpoon Boy

    WoodenSpoon Boy New Member

    I dont think the first ones been cleaned , seems like the actual metal mixture itsself
     
  13. nohope587

    nohope587 Senior Member

    they have both been in the hands of so called TPG experts and cleaning was never mentioned.
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    The '64 has several large patches of hairlines. While I cannot detect any sign of circulation on either coin, they both appear to have been lightly thumbed in spots. Probably to remove unsightly toning in the fields.
     
  15. Arizona Jack

    Arizona Jack The Lincoln-ator

    Excellent pictures !!!!

    Don't know much about 2 cent coins but they both look attractive
     
  16. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    Very attractive AUNCs, nearly mint state, nice toning. 1865 has an amnolity on the top of the 5.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page