Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 1461484, member: 36230&quot;]The cleaned/uncleaned argument is meaningless since with this coin (condition) it dosen&#039;t really matter. While it does not appear to have been recently cleaned, for a raw, low grade, very common <u>problem</u> coin worth basically melt, the surfaces look fine. Were I the OP I would be more concerned about the wear pattern, but he seems to know everything already. As for the 62-S in the link, it was deemed market acceptable.. not uncleaned. Big difference, and understanding this difference is key (although I do agree with Doug on this one). Search around and you will find coins with obvious signs of cleaning that reside in top TPG slabs. Regardless.. the point is that with this coin it does not matter. If the OP wants to continue with this, let him. The only one he will be hurting is himself. </p><p><br /></p><p>Now Buddy, I am sorry to break it to you, but such a coin is not special and can be had for around melt. In years past when silver was not so high, sure.. it may have been worth a <u>small</u> premium, but that has basically disappeared. Just because it sells for more on ebay, or someone wants $X, or its old, this does not make it valuable. </p><p><br /></p><p>In the future I will remember that there is no reason to sugar coat things with you... was just trying to be nice.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in