Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;David Atherton, post: 3797951, member: 82616&quot;]An interesting postscript:</p><p><br /></p><p>Curiously, in the RIC concordance with the first edition, this type is listed as old RIC 17 &#039;Unverified: plated hybrid?&#039; (again citing Cohen) without a new corresponding RIC number even though it is in the catalogue as RIC 700 with no such disclaimers. My example has evidence of being plated and is a double die match with the RIC plate coin. It is likely all specimens of the type are plated and therefore not official issue.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in