Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jackrabb1t, post: 2540814, member: 42482&quot;]Apparently the window of time available to edit my post is gone, but I was doing some more research on this piece and I feel like I need to post some additional information. Knowledge is everything in this hobby, after all.</p><p><br /></p><p>The following quote from John Stafford-Langan, an Irish coin specialist, was taken from <a href="http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=85667#762110" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=85667#762110" rel="nofollow">this</a> Coin Community thread. He is speaking in the context of possible varieties of the 1968 Irish penny, but he mentions something in relation to these specimen strikes:</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><p><font size="3">I have a fairly extensive assembly (I&#039;d hesitate to call it a collection) of Irish 1968 pennies - and I do have examples of this distinction - unfortunately I also have examples which fall into the gap between the two coins illustrated on the site, which suggested that this is not a case of two distinct pieces rather of a range of types of which these two are near the extreme ends - at least this had always been my understanding.</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">However recent, as yet unpublished, research is uncovering evidence that The Royal Mint was under pressure to produce the coins for Ireland in 1968 (remembering that they had stopped the production of English pennies in 1967) as they were ramping up production of the new decimal coins (and complete replacement required many more coins than normal annual production for wastage and economic growth / inflation). And it looks as if The Royal Mint may have contracted the external producton of as much as 9 million of these Irish pennies - but the dies should still have been Royal Mint dies. The Royal Mint was in competition with other mints for the Irish business, which was at the time very attractive to them for the decimal coins as they did not need to retool for blank production for the Irish coins (which they would typically have to do for other countries), so they appear to have wanted to keep their short term production shortfall secret from the Irish Central Bank. If this was the case then even if The Royal Mint was responsible for the supply of dies to the contractor then if they were using different minting technology the die production may have resulted in these types of differences.</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">I haven&#039;t really though much about the range of 1968 pennies for a while - but in the light of this new evidence (which I have yet to understand fully) I will have to look again. And it may be that instead of a continuous range of types with the extremes appearing quite distinct there may be two ranges of types - with some of the coins quite similar but the extremes being quite identifiable. </font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">The picture is confused by the fact that there was a small batch of &#039;proof&#039; coins from an external contractor that came to light a few years ago - and which were initally identified as a small trial production of coins for a proof set to mark the end of the LSD coinage. But it now looks as if these coins may have been the trial pieces associated with the contracting of the external production of currency pieces to meet The Royal Mint shortfall.</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>This would seem to indicate that my piece was one of 20 specimen strikes made as a proof of concept for possible contract production of circulating coins, not as a special mint set meant to mark the end of pre-decimal coinage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in