Woohoo! My first US newp in a while! (with GTG poll)

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by lordmarcovan, Feb 7, 2018.

?

Guess the grade. After 25 votes, that will be revealed in a later post.

  1. AU55

    8.1%
  2. AU58

    10.8%
  3. MS62

    2.7%
  4. MS63

    10.8%
  5. MS64

    24.3%
  6. MS65

    32.4%
  7. MS66

    2.7%
  8. MS67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. MS68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. "Details" grade (problem coin)

    8.1%
  1. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    Uh-oh.... now you've gone and done it.
     
  4. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Whoopsie. Did I just open another Pandora's box? :facepalm::muted:
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  5. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    His legend grows... it will be worse this time....
     
  6. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    TBH, I kind of miss him. He made for an entertaining read, and in all actuality, he's a pretty good sport about all the flack.
     
  7. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    To change the subject back to my US coin newps, here's the one I bought from @ToughCOINS.

    I bought this 2001-P dime with missing obverse clad layer from him yesterday.

    Not only had my Eclectic Box gotten light on US material, it was also light on moderns, with nothing "newer" than 1929 until I bought this yesterday. I'll send it off to PCGS along with a nicely toned 1944 cent I plucked from an amazing roll I once had.

    I'm not much into moderns except for some World proofs, and have never had any interest in Roosevelt dimes (except when finding silver ones while detecting, or in change). Certainly I have no interest in clad Roosies.

    But when Eclecticism is one's whole collecting philosophy, one must branch out and explore new things occasionally.

    Besides, this one's from my daughter's birthyear. :)

    error-0.10-missing-obv-clad-1_size0.jpg error-0.10-missing-obv-clad-2_size0.jpg
     
  8. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    It's like Beetlejuice. Tag him 2 more times and we're all toast.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    ROFL :hilarious:

    Unless, of course, his duties as Chairman of Wooderson Gallery & Rare Coins & Expert Grader are too strenuous. He may just be a busy man, slinging sacks o' Saints & Stellas seven days a week.
     
  10. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Great coin, Me Lord.

    Eddie boy vanished at the end of November. Guess the network cancelled him.
     
  11. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Back to the Buffalo, there is the matter of that one little dark speck (carbon spot?) near the rim at about 4:00 on the reverse, but I don't find that terribly distracting and it's more like a "Cindy Crawford beauty mark" kind of thing.

    Good thing it's tiny, and not any higher up, or people would start all the "pooping buffalo" talk ...

    s3fa70ydeynk.jpeg



     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  12. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    If you were 105 years old, you’d have a few blemishes, too.:D
     
  13. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    And now, after @Deacon Ray did his digital magic, to match 'em to my standard format... :)

    1913nickel.jpg 2001dime.jpg

    He even "shadowboxed" the one I didn't buy.

    I ran out of "mad money" to splurge. It was either both the nickel and dime above, or just the half dollar below. I might go back for the half later - or not - depending on circumstances.

    1838dollar.jpg
     
  14. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    More than a few! I already have plenty, at less than half that age!

    Man, it's still hard to get my head around the idea that there are now some Buffalo nickels over 100 years old. I'm just getting used to the idea of Lincoln cents passing their own centennial.
     
  15. Maxfli

    Maxfli Well-Known Member

    The PCGS link didn't work for me. What's the grade?
     
  16. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Hm. Weird. I've tested it. Works fine for me. Anyone else have that issue?

    Try again?

    Anyway, it's an MS65. Standard holder. Graded within the last 5 years or so.
     
  17. gronnh20

    gronnh20 Well-Known Member

    Worked fine for me. I opened it in a new tab.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  18. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Might have to do with the poll, Showed up for me.
    Beetle Juice, Beatle Juice, Beatle Juice.o_O
     
  19. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I guessed 65. Buffs are hard to grade, and toned buffs are even harder. That's an unusually attractive one, congrats!
     
  20. Maxfli

    Maxfli Well-Known Member

    It's the fault of my old Mac laptop. I'm finding that it's incompatible with more and more sites. Linked worked fine on my newer desktop machine.
     
  21. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    That would drive me bonkers.

    Our hotel property management system here at work runs off Fred Flintstone's Browser Internet Explorer, so that has to be our default browser, since the PMS doesn't play well with Chrome and more modern browsers. So anytime I send a hyperlink in an in-house email, or put one in a document, and you click on it, it opens in IE by default, and 2/3 of the time doesn't work.

    Of course in my downtime, in the wee hours when my work is caught up, I'm on CoinTalk in a Chrome browser. :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page