Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
William Pitt Halfpenny 1766
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="nerarities, post: 955136, member: 26684"]Hey ARguy,</p><p><br /></p><p>Very nice Pitt Token. I am in the group that likes the clip as well. I was thinking more about the silvering and the concept that you can up with especially the weight argument. These pieces obviously circulated in some capacity, but maybe just more as a pocket piece than an actual spending coin. (Though any copper coin could be used to buy certain things as it was based on total weight of coins). I am attaching the picture of the example I sold at the last Baltimore show. </p><p><br /></p><p>Regarding the silvering, I think that you are most likely right. What I think is safe to assume is that someone with a bunch of these (possibly the maker of them originally) silvered them at the same time, not many different people silvering their own example. The silvering I have seen on these (I have seen two or three with full silvering intact and high grade coins) looks very old and almost appears to have been there since the coins were struck. It is something someone should look into more (all silvering on colonial period coinage). It really is interesting. I know some Hibernia's/Rosa's have been found with a silvering wash, but many think that the silver wash was applied before the striking of the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>I love the Washington and the Virginia. I have seen some of the Washington pieces gilded before, and I have handled two that were fire gilt. I think people liked having something different as a carry around piece. (for something like the 100 year anniversary). I agree with you 100% that the gilding was done early and not recently. The look in hand on the gilt pieces is very old looking. I have seen some other colonial coppers with more recent silvering and gilding, and it looks very recent to my eyes, nothing like it does on the Washington piece you show. </p><p><br /></p><p>The silvered Viriginia is very cool as well. I have never seen anything like that before. I agree with your thoughts as well on why/how that was made.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="nerarities, post: 955136, member: 26684"]Hey ARguy, Very nice Pitt Token. I am in the group that likes the clip as well. I was thinking more about the silvering and the concept that you can up with especially the weight argument. These pieces obviously circulated in some capacity, but maybe just more as a pocket piece than an actual spending coin. (Though any copper coin could be used to buy certain things as it was based on total weight of coins). I am attaching the picture of the example I sold at the last Baltimore show. Regarding the silvering, I think that you are most likely right. What I think is safe to assume is that someone with a bunch of these (possibly the maker of them originally) silvered them at the same time, not many different people silvering their own example. The silvering I have seen on these (I have seen two or three with full silvering intact and high grade coins) looks very old and almost appears to have been there since the coins were struck. It is something someone should look into more (all silvering on colonial period coinage). It really is interesting. I know some Hibernia's/Rosa's have been found with a silvering wash, but many think that the silver wash was applied before the striking of the coin. I love the Washington and the Virginia. I have seen some of the Washington pieces gilded before, and I have handled two that were fire gilt. I think people liked having something different as a carry around piece. (for something like the 100 year anniversary). I agree with you 100% that the gilding was done early and not recently. The look in hand on the gilt pieces is very old looking. I have seen some other colonial coppers with more recent silvering and gilding, and it looks very recent to my eyes, nothing like it does on the Washington piece you show. The silvered Viriginia is very cool as well. I have never seen anything like that before. I agree with your thoughts as well on why/how that was made.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
William Pitt Halfpenny 1766
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...