Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;gxseries, post: 183265, member: 4373&quot;]Current way of sorting infomation from what is right to what is junk is still not clear yet. Until this issue is fully resolved, infomation is nothing but questionable materials unless it&#039;s fully researched, not just quoted from various numismatic materials. </p><p><br /></p><p>Obviously, online encyclopedias do have plenty of faults and smaller ones like mentioned here don&#039;t stand much chances having enough decent infomation (hence redundent) unless they are of full good articles, which unfortunately, I don&#039;t see how it&#039;s going to be numismatic related. Current wikipedia do have vague infomation but to make it more specific, I&#039;m not too sure how you are going to address specific copyright holders etc. </p><p><br /></p><p>Frankly speaking, the more infomation out there it is, the more useless infomation becomes as you don&#039;t have to search through 10,000+ websites just for one topic.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in