Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3993111, member: 19165&quot;]The chances are extremely high that you&#039;ll get 64 from PCGS. There aren&#039;t a lot of marks, and the luster appears strong. </p><p><br /></p><p>However, neither NGC or PCGS should have called that FBL. There is a mark across the bottom set of lines towards the left that precludes the PCGS designation (they only look at the bottom set of lines), and there are marks across both the top and bottom lines that should preclude the NGC designation (NGC looks at both sets of lines). </p><p><br /></p><p>I am extremely disappointed that NGC called this FBL. Instead of crossing to PCGS, you should submit this to NGC for Presidential Review and have them remove the FBL and re-imburse you for their mistake.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in