Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NorthKorea, post: 22960141, member: 29643&quot;]Machine learning and AI is inadequate to grade ANYTHING yet. Computers still have issues properly identifying counterfeits, let alone determining net grades.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think that CAC will do extremely well on coins that it passes, but I feel they might have a much higher fail rate than PCGS/NGC, which could hurt their reputation. As it stands, people view CAC as a grade confirmation company. CAC issues beans based upon agreement with the “minimum grade” and “original surfaces” models.</p><p><br /></p><p>I like how the holder looks, so, if all CAC does is reholder (from PCGS/NGC) coins to CACG holders, then I think they might do fairly well. Their market would be limited to elite collectors who simply trust CAC and its holder tech over the existing holders.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in