Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2523351, member: 22331&quot;]I would suggest before you make statements (i.e. not opinions) that you learn more about this firm that seemingly professes crem de la crem knowledge in Numismatics selection for sales of associated products. Their &quot;premiums&quot; are supposedly reflective of their selections capability.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you&#039;d objectively researched Hughs postings on this site, you would probably determined that he has been seriously involved in litigation with &quot;HA&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p>I was just a client who had extensive expensive transactions with the firm, with them as a private auctioning firm, and an internet auction seller where they accept returns. I stopped transacting with the firm when they violated normally understood private auction terms, but I continued with internet sales where they performed properly.</p><p><br /></p><p>They later tried a tactic which was generally known throughout the industry to violate state statutes, in an attempt to ensnare a relatively large value of premium certified numismatic Gold coins. I complied until written proof of violation was established, verbal challenge was established, and they reneged on written promises, withdrawing transactions in the state. The coins weren&#039;t sent, eliminating action for damages, but at an appropriate time, with additional statute violations shown which were common to others, Federal action can possibly be initiated. </p><p><br /></p><p>I believe you could determine that public documented statements of fact, believed inaccurate, can be established as reason for subpoena, depositions, in an appropriate legal action.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in