Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Why would an Olympic Committee purchase the seigniorage of its gold coins?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mlov43, post: 3600207, member: 16729"]Yes, I think that's part of it. But "buying the seigniorage" of the gold coins opens up another question for me. I'll explain.</p><p><br /></p><p>In an earlier episode concerning a previous set of "pre-Olympic" coins issued in 1982 and 1983, the Seoul Olympic Committee attempted to receive "seigniorage and surcharge funding" from the sale of the coins (see Option "C" in the different funding formulae from the sale of Olympics coins in Post #8, above). I wrote an article about these "pre-Olympic" coins, on page 42 of this journal:<a href="https://issuu.com/jeandigitala1/docs/the_fourteenth_issue_of_jean" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://issuu.com/jeandigitala1/docs/the_fourteenth_issue_of_jean" rel="nofollow">https://issuu.com/jeandigitala1/docs/the_fourteenth_issue_of_jean</a></p><p><br /></p><p>In that article, you can see that they actually passed legislation that seigniorage funding would become the funding formula. So it was the law by 1983.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, the Olympic Committee never got seigniorage funding from those "pre-Olympic" coins. Bank of Korea sources and newspaper sources do say that surcharges were added upon the sale of the coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>I couldn't find any news articles as to why seigniorage funding failed for the "pre-Olympic" coins. However, the Bank of Korea was fighting the seigniorage funding model from the beginning by citing their own central banking laws, according to a source, so I'm guessing that's the reason.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, the coins I'm concerned about in this thread are the "official" 1988 Seoul Olympics coins that were issued in 1987 and 1988. This Korean author (former currency designer) wrote that (paraphrasing) 'the Seoul Olympic Committee purchased the seigniorage from the Bank of Korea only in the case of the gold coins.' </p><p><br /></p><p>That might seem to indicate that the Olympic Committee did NOT "buy the seigniorage" for all the millions of other non-gold coins made in this Olympic commemorative issue. In other words, for the "official" 1988 Olympics coins, the Seoul Committee got both seigniorage and surcharge funding for the non-gold coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>I cannot find information that would confirm the overall Olympic funding formula from the sale of the non-gold coins: Was it just surcharge, or seigniorage and surcharge? I gotta keep digging.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mlov43, post: 3600207, member: 16729"]Yes, I think that's part of it. But "buying the seigniorage" of the gold coins opens up another question for me. I'll explain. In an earlier episode concerning a previous set of "pre-Olympic" coins issued in 1982 and 1983, the Seoul Olympic Committee attempted to receive "seigniorage and surcharge funding" from the sale of the coins (see Option "C" in the different funding formulae from the sale of Olympics coins in Post #8, above). I wrote an article about these "pre-Olympic" coins, on page 42 of this journal:[URL]https://issuu.com/jeandigitala1/docs/the_fourteenth_issue_of_jean[/URL] In that article, you can see that they actually passed legislation that seigniorage funding would become the funding formula. So it was the law by 1983. However, the Olympic Committee never got seigniorage funding from those "pre-Olympic" coins. Bank of Korea sources and newspaper sources do say that surcharges were added upon the sale of the coins. I couldn't find any news articles as to why seigniorage funding failed for the "pre-Olympic" coins. However, the Bank of Korea was fighting the seigniorage funding model from the beginning by citing their own central banking laws, according to a source, so I'm guessing that's the reason. Now, the coins I'm concerned about in this thread are the "official" 1988 Seoul Olympics coins that were issued in 1987 and 1988. This Korean author (former currency designer) wrote that (paraphrasing) 'the Seoul Olympic Committee purchased the seigniorage from the Bank of Korea only in the case of the gold coins.' That might seem to indicate that the Olympic Committee did NOT "buy the seigniorage" for all the millions of other non-gold coins made in this Olympic commemorative issue. In other words, for the "official" 1988 Olympics coins, the Seoul Committee got both seigniorage and surcharge funding for the non-gold coins. I cannot find information that would confirm the overall Olympic funding formula from the sale of the non-gold coins: Was it just surcharge, or seigniorage and surcharge? I gotta keep digging.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Why would an Olympic Committee purchase the seigniorage of its gold coins?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...