Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bdunnse, post: 1940620, member: 57317&quot;]pdf link...</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2265&amp;context=clevstlrev" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2265&amp;context=clevstlrev" rel="nofollow">http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2265&amp;context=clevstlrev</a></p><p><br /></p><p>which is a very intersting read...</p><p><br /></p><p>In its exhaustive study of current problems in the American coin-age system, RTI concluded that the quarter was probably not the most efficient denomination, and that a twenty cent piece should, in an optimally efficient system, be used as a replacement. 1 6 0 RTI recognized that there was little likelihood of this occurring because &quot;the quarter has become a standard unit of account and value ... [and] equipment modification and commercial transaction costs associated with its&nbsp; elimination and subsequent replacement with a twenty cent coin would far exceed those</p><p>which could be offset by&nbsp; the marginal increase in theoretic efficiency.&quot;&#039;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in