Why were some coins cast and not struck?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Herberto, Feb 4, 2016.

  1. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    A punch is a die technically, so the first coin was struck. Just not as much care was taken in flan preparation.

    Edit: Btw, there is a lot of confusion about the first coins. People say they were struck in naturally occurring electrum. While its true there are naturally occurring electrum nuggets in Lydia, they had variable percentages of gold and silver. The first thing the mint did, from the very beginning, was to separate the silver and gold into separate metals and then recombine them in the lowest acceptable percentage of gold content. From the very beginning, governments have misled and cheated the people it would seem.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016
    Alegandron and Kentucky like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    In China, and cultures heavily influenced by its currency system (Japan, Vietnam, etc), most currency types are of extreme low values. They even had laws to prevent people from hoarding coins, because it's so easy to do that and it would affect circulation. Wealth in those cultures (before re-instroduction of high value coinage in the past 700 years or so) were represented by other means, not coins.

    When all coins were copper and of penny value, even if the production method was just slightly less costly, or required few less labor, it would had been chosen since there's virtually no worry of counterfeits.

    The other thing is, labor cost in coin production, even those copper-iron alloy ones, is nothing compared to value of the metal. Again, even copper worth far more than labor in those days.

    On the other topic, casting flans is different from casting coins....
    More importantly though, some of you seemed to have misunderstood casting to be a 1 step process, it is not. You don't just make molds from masters (seeds), there are production masters, because mold-making deteriorates masters. So again, completely wrong guys, the "seed" in casting gets worn too, and depend on the process, might wear faster than punching does to a die.

    There are different types of casting, even in ancient worlds. Sand mold, clay mold, wax mold, then you have loss wax which is a completely different animal.
    Ever seen inca gold figures? You can't make that stuff beating metal, and they didn't have the technology to produce harder alloy than gold so they could beat metal (or die punch) anyway.
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  4. Ardatirion

    Ardatirion Où est mon poisson

    To my knowledge,Western ancient cast coinage did not use seed coins. The designs were engraved directly into the molds.
     
    Alegandron and Ancientnoob like this.
  5. brassnautilus

    brassnautilus Well-Known Member

    Essentially, striking was used as a mean of certification, of the metal content.
    It's just in western coinage it was such commonplace to use precious metal that all coins were "certified", down to bronze (eventhough there was no real need to do that to copper).
    The reason behind is precisely that there is not a lot of differences in cost of the 2 production methods. Where the industry was calibrated to striking (in Rome), they used dies instead of opening up a complete branch of manufacturing for just the low value coins.

    Vise versa, where maybe something happened that the mint facility was destroyed or personnel dispersed, they would need to rebuild a manufacturing process. If the type of coins they planned to produce were all low valued and required no striking process to "certify" them, then they might choose to cast, because it's a little easier, required fewer skilled labor.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016
  6. Ardatirion

    Ardatirion Où est mon poisson

    This all makes sense on paper, but does it really fit the physical evidence mentioned by medoraman and myself?
     
  7. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I find it hard to believe we have had so few photos in this thread so I'll show a few cast coins. My favorite is the Aes Grave sextans turtle. I would love to have a liberal as (full pound size) but decent ones seem to be $4000 up. They are on the list of coins that can't be imported into the US so it is unlikely that the ones here will go down.
    ra0100bb1666.jpg

    Chach, 'snow leopard' IDed as such since that was the big cat of note in the area at the time but the detail really does not prove anything.
    ou4370bb2533.jpg

    Sungas, Ganges Valley AE15
    oi3330bb2877.jpg
     
  8. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    Selinos, AE Cast Tetras (3 Onkia)
    Selinos Tetras.jpg

    Akragas, AE Cast Onkia (1 Onkia)
    Sicily Akragas.jpg

    Selinos, AE Cast Onkia (1 Onkia)
    Sicily Selinos.jpg

    Akragas, AE Cast Trias (4 Onkia)
    akragas Trias.jpg

    Celtic, Gaul, AE18 Cast Potin

    Celtic Gaul AE Potin.JPG

    => is that cast enuf for ya?!!

    :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016
  9. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    :wideyed:Want MORE, Want MORE:bigtears::bigtears:

    What's the "bowl-shaped" one?
     
    stevex6 likes this.
  10. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    here's a cast RR semuncia...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Alegandron, dlhill132, zumbly and 2 others like this.
  11. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    This looks struck to me.
     
    red_spork likes this.
  12. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    is it? i thought these were cast...but am not at all sure.
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2016
  13. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Ditto.
     
  14. rrdenarius

    rrdenarius non omnibus dormio

    Doug, just for you. Thanks for the opening.
    I look for new cast pieces at any auction I see now. I have one on its way & will share it soon, I hope.
    my favorite set
    P8181316.JPG P8181308.JPG
    super fly
    TV167 Baldwins 10.13.15.jpg
    small as
    Post_semilibrale As obv Cr41.5a Art Asta 24.1E 10.18.13.jpg Post_semilibrale As rev Cr41.5a Art Asta 24.1E 10.18.13.jpg
    dolphin and thunderbolt triens
    P1010316.JPG P1010324.JPG
     
    dlhill132, chrsmat71, zumbly and 3 others like this.
  15. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    Seriously, what is a cast flan without a big casting spur:

    [​IMG]

    From Syracuse ca. 400BC - the flan was cast of course then the coin was struck - but the casting spur was never broken off! Lazy Syracusians.
     
  16. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

  17. Quant.Geek

    Quant.Geek Well-Known Member

    WOW!!! That is a coin with a leg and a hoof!!??!! :wideyed:
     
  18. Quant.Geek

    Quant.Geek Well-Known Member

    Going back to some of the questions by Herberto that somehow got unanswered. The original coin that started this post is indeed cast as opposed to being struck. The evidence is clearly in the article I posted earlier with images of the casting molds used. The monogram is that of Romanus II (Ρωμανός as seen on the coin). There is some debate as to whether there is a variety that has a blank obverse or it is just heavily worn down version of the one with steps on it.

    The coins from Cherson are known to be cast and the question of whether there are other Byzantine cast coins, I believe there were others but I can't seem to remember what they were or references to them.
     
    Ancientnoob likes this.
  19. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    Casting spurs with this series is testament to the lazy Syracusians:

    [​IMG]

    Another with Arethusa that I had to have because of the fantastic design and condition of the coin, and the fact that Arethusa's "bun" is on the spur.
     
    Bing, stevex6, Alegandron and 2 others like this.
  20. JBGood

    JBGood Collector of coinage Supporter

  21. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page