Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Blissskr, post: 2964463, member: 34882&quot;]It was among the suggestions but if you read until the end of the actual act they address why they don&#039;t have to address &#039;fantasy&#039; coins despite multiple parties requesting it. Some of those parties i.e. Carr himself state the opinion that they shouldn&#039;t have to be marked. Before going on to state that they must be marked because it&#039;s already been addressed and the precedent was set with Gold Bullion Intl. What&#039;s termed a &#039;imitation numismatic items&#039; must be marked and the language clearly indicates they feel that &#039;fantasy&#039; coins meet the criteria.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in