Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why Theodora?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Sallent, post: 3629640, member: 76194"]It's all in the name....<b>Theodora Maximiana</b>, as in daughter (biological or adopted) of emperor Maximian.</p><p><br /></p><p>It was a way for the Constantine boys to say....<u>"Hey, not only was our grandfather a tetrarch, but we also have a daughter of a tetrarch in our family."</u></p><p><br /></p><p>Sure, she may not have been a blood relative, but since when did that stop a Roman from using a "relative's" name as a way to boost their own legitimacy?</p><p><br /></p><p>Look at the Julio-Claudian emperors, look at the Severans, look at countless others who used names of previous emperors (many whom had at best a made-up connection ....not even an adoptive link). Being a blood relative of a nobody meant less in the ancient world than being related to a powerful name by either adoption, marriage, or totally made up link. Why do you think Elagabalus claimed that he was the son of Caracalla? Who cares if it wasn't true? As long as the soldiers believed it, and there wad some political capital to be gained, that's all that really mattered.</p><p><br /></p><p>PS: Here's Helena...</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]973458[/ATTACH] </p><p>Helena, Mother of Constantine, 327 - 328 AD</p><p>AE Follis, Antioch Mint, 20mm, 2.88 grams</p><p>Obverse: FL HELENA AVGVSTA, Diademed and mantled bust of Helena right.</p><p>Reverse: SECVRITAS REIPVBLICAE, Securitas standing left holding branch and raising robe with right hand, DE in right field, SMANT in exergue</p><p>RIC80[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Sallent, post: 3629640, member: 76194"]It's all in the name....[B]Theodora Maximiana[/B], as in daughter (biological or adopted) of emperor Maximian. It was a way for the Constantine boys to say....[U]"Hey, not only was our grandfather a tetrarch, but we also have a daughter of a tetrarch in our family."[/U] Sure, she may not have been a blood relative, but since when did that stop a Roman from using a "relative's" name as a way to boost their own legitimacy? Look at the Julio-Claudian emperors, look at the Severans, look at countless others who used names of previous emperors (many whom had at best a made-up connection ....not even an adoptive link). Being a blood relative of a nobody meant less in the ancient world than being related to a powerful name by either adoption, marriage, or totally made up link. Why do you think Elagabalus claimed that he was the son of Caracalla? Who cares if it wasn't true? As long as the soldiers believed it, and there wad some political capital to be gained, that's all that really mattered. PS: Here's Helena... [ATTACH=full]973458[/ATTACH] Helena, Mother of Constantine, 327 - 328 AD AE Follis, Antioch Mint, 20mm, 2.88 grams Obverse: FL HELENA AVGVSTA, Diademed and mantled bust of Helena right. Reverse: SECVRITAS REIPVBLICAE, Securitas standing left holding branch and raising robe with right hand, DE in right field, SMANT in exergue RIC80[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why Theodora?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...