Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Why the 2003A $2
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="sanskrit, post: 176901, member: 6378"]Agreed, but I can't think of a reason why they wouldn't. A redesign of the five and hundred would do it, as was the case with series 2004 twenties and fifties versus 2003 everything else, but for just a signature change everything should *theoretically* be set to the same series. Granted, it is the goverment and they make little sense sometimes...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="sanskrit, post: 176901, member: 6378"]Agreed, but I can't think of a reason why they wouldn't. A redesign of the five and hundred would do it, as was the case with series 2004 twenties and fifties versus 2003 everything else, but for just a signature change everything should *theoretically* be set to the same series. Granted, it is the goverment and they make little sense sometimes...[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Why the 2003A $2
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...