Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;johnmilton, post: 3947263, member: 101855&quot;]There was a lot more involved when NGC made that decision. I, for one, spent many hours building my registry with photographs and write-ups that were sometimes quite extensive. Putting up a good registry set, that is in the running for &quot;Best presented,&quot; is not &quot;free.&quot; It requires a lot of work.</p><p><br /></p><p>Finding properly graded, attractive coins from either service is not that easy when you are looking for classic coins with limited surviving populations. When you are limited to one company&#039;s product, it makes that search that much harder.</p><p><br /></p><p>NGC&#039;s decision left me hamstrung so far as taking my registry sets any further. To be honest I find more coins that I like in PCGS than NGC holders. A big part of the reason is that so many of the NGC&#039;s better coins get crossed to PCGS. </p><p><br /></p><p>I had never joined the PCGS registry until NGC made their NGC only decision. I did not like their PCGS only policy. I joined PCGS registry, mostly to display my Classic Head $2.50 set. Given their PCGS requirement, I could see early on that it was a waste of time for me to post my complete type of coins there. So I gave up on the registry stuff all together.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now that NGC has reversed their decision, I’ll spend some more time on it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in