Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why Numismatic Hoards Might Be Better in Collectors' Hands
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 3293746, member: 93416"]Fascinating stuff Ed!</p><p><br /></p><p>The most probable conclusion, on the nails, seems to me to be that the excavator - Richmond - indeed carted most of the nails round to a local steel works for use as scrap iron, but the folk at the steel works itself had a higher regard for Roman artefacts than he did, and did not melt them – as your link apparently indicates the works was still holding a substantial amount of them as late as 2011. (Maybe that’s where Harlan J Berk’s are coming from?)</p><p><br /></p><p>Regarding the Wiki page, the pre-11th October page seems to be an innocent error – correctly describing what Richmond intended.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 11th October Wiki page changes were made anonymously. Impossible to say whether or not they were triggered by the September comments on Coin Talk, but on the evidence you present they seem to be both false, and worse, to have been given a false substantiation.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is that how you read the situation?</p><p><br /></p><p>In the normal course of things all these matters should be clarified from the excavation report on the site – but Richmond never produced one – all Canmore shows in the archive are some notebooks and a card index written by his assistant: J. K. S. St. Joseph .</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://canmore.org.uk/site/28592/inchtuthil" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://canmore.org.uk/site/28592/inchtuthil" rel="nofollow">https://canmore.org.uk/site/28592/inchtuthil</a></p><p><br /></p><p>However, in a rather well know kind of “rescue archaeology”, around 1985, Dr Lynn-F.-Pitts was sent in to help St Joseph (by that time retired and in his 70’s) to excavate the bottom of his filing cabinets - and try and reconstruct what had actually been done more than 20 years earlier by Richmond and himself. There is a copy of the published result of that here if anyone is interested:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lynn-F.-Pitts/e/B001KIMEMS" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lynn-F.-Pitts/e/B001KIMEMS" rel="nofollow">https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lynn-F.-Pitts/e/B001KIMEMS</a></p><p><br /></p><p>It appears Dr Pitts is still active:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.romansociety.org/about/governance/officers.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.romansociety.org/about/governance/officers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.romansociety.org/about/governance/officers.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Rob T</p><p><br /></p><p>PS Richmond was an Oxford pupil of the archaeologist R G Collingwood. Collingwood held astonishingly elitist opinions. I will not quote them - people would probably not believe me if I did.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 3293746, member: 93416"]Fascinating stuff Ed! The most probable conclusion, on the nails, seems to me to be that the excavator - Richmond - indeed carted most of the nails round to a local steel works for use as scrap iron, but the folk at the steel works itself had a higher regard for Roman artefacts than he did, and did not melt them – as your link apparently indicates the works was still holding a substantial amount of them as late as 2011. (Maybe that’s where Harlan J Berk’s are coming from?) Regarding the Wiki page, the pre-11th October page seems to be an innocent error – correctly describing what Richmond intended. The 11th October Wiki page changes were made anonymously. Impossible to say whether or not they were triggered by the September comments on Coin Talk, but on the evidence you present they seem to be both false, and worse, to have been given a false substantiation. Is that how you read the situation? In the normal course of things all these matters should be clarified from the excavation report on the site – but Richmond never produced one – all Canmore shows in the archive are some notebooks and a card index written by his assistant: J. K. S. St. Joseph . [url]https://canmore.org.uk/site/28592/inchtuthil[/url] However, in a rather well know kind of “rescue archaeology”, around 1985, Dr Lynn-F.-Pitts was sent in to help St Joseph (by that time retired and in his 70’s) to excavate the bottom of his filing cabinets - and try and reconstruct what had actually been done more than 20 years earlier by Richmond and himself. There is a copy of the published result of that here if anyone is interested: [url]https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lynn-F.-Pitts/e/B001KIMEMS[/url] It appears Dr Pitts is still active: [url]http://www.romansociety.org/about/governance/officers.html[/url] Rob T PS Richmond was an Oxford pupil of the archaeologist R G Collingwood. Collingwood held astonishingly elitist opinions. I will not quote them - people would probably not believe me if I did.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why Numismatic Hoards Might Be Better in Collectors' Hands
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...