Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Why isn't "Machine Doubling" Considered an Error?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3813764, member: 24314"]JCro57, posted: Here is one. The labels says it is a struck fragment. That implies it entered the chamber as a fragment; it did not. It is the floor of a die cap. Wrong error type.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1016485[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Below is the link to Jon Sullivan's page, which is who I got it from.</p><p><a href="https://sullivannumismatics.com/coin/ngc-1c-1989-lincoln-cent-multi-struck-base-die-cap-ms65-rb?v=4790" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://sullivannumismatics.com/coin/ngc-1c-1989-lincoln-cent-multi-struck-base-die-cap-ms65-rb?v=4790" rel="nofollow">https://sullivannumismatics.com/coin/ngc-1c-1989-lincoln-cent-multi-struck-base-die-cap-ms65-rb?v=4790</a></p><p><br /></p><p><b><i><span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">NOT GOOD ENOUGHT EXAMPLE!</span></i></b> </p><p><br /></p><p><b>You have left out the most important part of Mr. Sullivan's link:</b></p><p><br /></p><p>"NGC 1989 Lincoln cent multi-struck on base of die cap. The coin is the central part of a die cap, that separated form the outer cap walls. <b><i><u><font size="5"><span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">NGC described it as a "fragment", <font size="6"><span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 102)">which is [it] is,</span></font></span></font></u></i></b> but it's more accurately described a being on a base of die cap."</p><p><br /></p><p>Unfortunately, the labels on TPGS slabs are very small. In many cases, there just is not enough room to "cover all the bases" with a full description that "MORE ACCURATELY" describes the error.</p><p><br /></p><p>Let's see the next TPGS label error. Sooner or later there MUST BE ONE ACTUAL MISTAKE (out of the dozens you have). </p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, thanks for posting this one. First I've ever seen. </p><p><br /></p><p>PS "You win" is just my way of saying that I don't care "why" most don't think it is an "error" although<span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 89)"> <b>it is </b></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">for anyone who wants it to be (because <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">it is</span> - LOL).</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">The best thing about this discussion is it gives all of us something to write about and may be helpful for beginners. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> However, as I requested, please keep posting interesting error coins as that will probably be of more educational use. </span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3813764, member: 24314"]JCro57, posted: Here is one. The labels says it is a struck fragment. That implies it entered the chamber as a fragment; it did not. It is the floor of a die cap. Wrong error type. [ATTACH=full]1016485[/ATTACH] Below is the link to Jon Sullivan's page, which is who I got it from. [URL]https://sullivannumismatics.com/coin/ngc-1c-1989-lincoln-cent-multi-struck-base-die-cap-ms65-rb?v=4790[/URL] [B][I][COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]NOT GOOD ENOUGHT EXAMPLE![/COLOR][/I][/B] [B]You have left out the most important part of Mr. Sullivan's link:[/B] "NGC 1989 Lincoln cent multi-struck on base of die cap. The coin is the central part of a die cap, that separated form the outer cap walls. [B][I][U][SIZE=5][COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]NGC described it as a "fragment", [SIZE=6][COLOR=rgb(0, 102, 102)]which is [it] is,[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/I][/B] but it's more accurately described a being on a base of die cap." Unfortunately, the labels on TPGS slabs are very small. In many cases, there just is not enough room to "cover all the bases" with a full description that "MORE ACCURATELY" describes the error. Let's see the next TPGS label error. Sooner or later there MUST BE ONE ACTUAL MISTAKE (out of the dozens you have). BTW, thanks for posting this one. First I've ever seen. PS "You win" is just my way of saying that I don't care "why" most don't think it is an "error" although[COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 89)] [B]it is [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]for anyone who wants it to be (because [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]it is[/COLOR] - LOL).[/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)] The best thing about this discussion is it gives all of us something to write about and may be helpful for beginners. :) However, as I requested, please keep posting interesting error coins as that will probably be of more educational use. [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Why isn't "Machine Doubling" Considered an Error?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...