Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Why is machine doubling not worth much?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 828344, member: 16510"]<b>foundinrolls or someone please help!!!!!</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>Your wrong.</p><p>I have read and read your responces here over and over again because to me they appear to be written with a geniune opinion. I am not a math or logic educated type person at all I will admit but, </p><p>Why would we ever care in the first place between coins struck by die #3 or die #99 if normally hubbed in the first place?</p><p>Why are you missing this?</p><p>We do not access coins on "die to die" when valuing a given doubled die from that year/mint. We value them "die to all dies" or "die amoung all all other dies" for a year/mint and even further "die, (doubled die) to all coins" that can be searched, have been found, lost and retired - that's why there are rare. It's the coin struck from that doubled die that we are looking for first and never have I heard doubled die coins so compared with other normally struck coins and their dies. What does that logic give us? </p><p> </p><p>Only xxx# of 1980-P DDO-001's have been found or are in existance. It does not matter for these purposes if there was 80,000 (which there is not) or 8,000,000 of same doubled die. If a hoard of them come to be found and put on the market the price, and rariety will be adjusted.</p><p>You combine this with the pool of what we are searching - you goota put things in some context don't you?</p><p>Your context is some form of an abstract I cannot understand perhaps and maybe even on some level correct but "we don't access the rarity of a coin as you describe", why would we ever?</p><p>In the before mentioned 1980-P DDO-001 we attach value because it's one significant doubled die coin amoung all 1980-p coins minted whether it be die #3 or die #99.</p><p> </p><p>When all this is combined with strength of doubling on a coin, desirabilty of the die (coin), popularity of the die (coin), number found of the coins struck from that die, what era it was in, (many moderns don't have to as largely doubled as in years past to become significant), and condition of the coin well,,,,,</p><p>With all this your still telling us the coins I just mentioned are no more rare than a normally struck coin from the all/any of the working dies for that year???</p><p> </p><p>I don't get it - I'd like to if you have a point here but right now your logic is has far from me as the moon or stars .[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 828344, member: 16510"][b]foundinrolls or someone please help!!!!![/b] Your wrong. I have read and read your responces here over and over again because to me they appear to be written with a geniune opinion. I am not a math or logic educated type person at all I will admit but, Why would we ever care in the first place between coins struck by die #3 or die #99 if normally hubbed in the first place? Why are you missing this? We do not access coins on "die to die" when valuing a given doubled die from that year/mint. We value them "die to all dies" or "die amoung all all other dies" for a year/mint and even further "die, (doubled die) to all coins" that can be searched, have been found, lost and retired - that's why there are rare. It's the coin struck from that doubled die that we are looking for first and never have I heard doubled die coins so compared with other normally struck coins and their dies. What does that logic give us? Only xxx# of 1980-P DDO-001's have been found or are in existance. It does not matter for these purposes if there was 80,000 (which there is not) or 8,000,000 of same doubled die. If a hoard of them come to be found and put on the market the price, and rariety will be adjusted. You combine this with the pool of what we are searching - you goota put things in some context don't you? Your context is some form of an abstract I cannot understand perhaps and maybe even on some level correct but "we don't access the rarity of a coin as you describe", why would we ever? In the before mentioned 1980-P DDO-001 we attach value because it's one significant doubled die coin amoung all 1980-p coins minted whether it be die #3 or die #99. When all this is combined with strength of doubling on a coin, desirabilty of the die (coin), popularity of the die (coin), number found of the coins struck from that die, what era it was in, (many moderns don't have to as largely doubled as in years past to become significant), and condition of the coin well,,,,, With all this your still telling us the coins I just mentioned are no more rare than a normally struck coin from the all/any of the working dies for that year??? I don't get it - I'd like to if you have a point here but right now your logic is has far from me as the moon or stars .[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Why is machine doubling not worth much?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...