Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 3317050, member: 71723&quot;]Why this will never come to court:</p><p><br /></p><p>“Standing, sometimes referred to as standing to sue, is the name of the federal law doctrine that focuses on whether a prospective plaintiff can show that some personal legal interest has been invaded by the defendant. It is not enough that a person is merely interested as a member of the general public in the resolution of the dispute. The person must have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.”</p><p><br /></p><p>What Dan does is victimless. No one can obtain standing.</p><p><br /></p><p>“Once a federal court determines that a real case or controversy exists, it must then ascertain whether the parties to the litigation have standing. The Supreme Court has developed an elaborate body of principles defining the nature and scope of standing. Basically, a plaintiff must have suffered some direct or substantial injury or be likely to suffer such an injury if a particular wrong is not redressed. A defendant must be the party responsible for perpetrating the alleged legal wrong.”</p><p><br /></p><p>Good luck with that, Carr haters. The alleged “harm” must be concrete, particularized, and imminent, and is NOT PERMITTED TO BE SPECULATIVE.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in