Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why is coinage from Anastasius considered to be the "beginning"?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Mr.MonkeySwag96, post: 8231518, member: 100951"]The reigns of Anastasius and the Justinian dynasty do mark a shift away from Late Roman coinage in terms of artistic style and imagery.</p><p><br /></p><p>During the 6th Century, the traditional pagan Roman imagery of deities disappeared on the coinage, to be replaced by Christian designs. The gold Solidus of Justin II was the last time traditional pagan imagery was on a Roman coin, as it depicts the goddesses Victoria and Constantinopolis. The Roman Victoria was first replaced by the Christian angel during the reign of Justinian on his solidii. Emperor Tiberius II took it a step further by issuing solidii that depict a cross potent on steps. The cross potent on steps reverse type would be a common motif on Byzantine coins until the Macedonian dynasty.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Follis of Anstastius represented an drastic artistic shift away from Roman coinage stylistically. Anastasius’s bust on his Follis display the crude, flat, linear portraiture that is characteristic of Byzantine coinage. Late Roman Imperial coins of earlier rulers such as Theodosius II tend to have more refined, higher relief, sculpted busts.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Mr.MonkeySwag96, post: 8231518, member: 100951"]The reigns of Anastasius and the Justinian dynasty do mark a shift away from Late Roman coinage in terms of artistic style and imagery. During the 6th Century, the traditional pagan Roman imagery of deities disappeared on the coinage, to be replaced by Christian designs. The gold Solidus of Justin II was the last time traditional pagan imagery was on a Roman coin, as it depicts the goddesses Victoria and Constantinopolis. The Roman Victoria was first replaced by the Christian angel during the reign of Justinian on his solidii. Emperor Tiberius II took it a step further by issuing solidii that depict a cross potent on steps. The cross potent on steps reverse type would be a common motif on Byzantine coins until the Macedonian dynasty. The Follis of Anstastius represented an drastic artistic shift away from Roman coinage stylistically. Anastasius’s bust on his Follis display the crude, flat, linear portraiture that is characteristic of Byzantine coinage. Late Roman Imperial coins of earlier rulers such as Theodosius II tend to have more refined, higher relief, sculpted busts.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why is coinage from Anastasius considered to be the "beginning"?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...