Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2121929, member: 28107&quot;]How did you know it was me?&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; Does my writing style make it that easy to identify my moniker from other forums?</p><p><br /></p><p>As with anything, YMMV.&nbsp; For gold and for many 19th century and 20th century type coins that are solid for the grade with normal eye appeal, CAC is a good option.&nbsp; If on the other hand, the coin are true monsters or are in the top 5-10% of the issue for eye appeal, then yes, other venues may prove more favorable.&nbsp; I never implied anything to the contrary and stated that I had coins that I felt had unusually strong eye appeal that I would not offer to CAC for this reason.&nbsp; The one price per sticker grade approach isn&#039;t best in every scenario, but in many it works well.&nbsp; To provide a bit more information on how CAC is a useful tool, when I cannot see a coin and am relying on internet images, the CAC sticker tells me that I can at least bid up to CAC&#039;s bid level.&nbsp; If I hate the coin, I can send it in with my next submission and get my money back.&nbsp; I have done this before.&nbsp; Some series are also more liquid than others.&nbsp; For series that are less liquid, you pretty much always have a buyer if it is CAC stickered.&nbsp; That is what I meant.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in