Why ICGS or NGC etc. when CAC can overrule there grading.

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Not Quite sure what happened there with my last post as it ended up in the quote I was trying to respond to.

 

First I would like to apologize to the op for this thread getting hijacked by going from a CAC thread to a gradeflation thread.


I think gradeflation would be accepted alot better if they (TPG's) would be a bit more consistant with all coins not just the ones that have better eye appeal.

Example #1: 1886-o morgans, nawlins mints are known for weak strikes yet how many 86-o's in AU58 holders should be in MS holders??????
Add in 84-s,96-0,97-o to that mix aswell.

Example #2: pre 33 walkers known fact that most are known for weak strikes.
Yet they get graded differently then their post 33 counter parts.

And that's just a few.

 

Been practicing for 30 years, and my skin has thickened to the point of making me uninsultable. I'm a tax lawyer. Tax lawyers are your friends!

Go ahead...hit me with your best shots.....