Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;midtncoin, post: 2968886, member: 89569&quot;]So I was noticing something that got me to thinking.&nbsp; (That seems to happen a lot with me).&nbsp; For some reason, it seems that in the &quot;modern era&quot; (post -1965), true doubled-dies seem to be almost exclusive to cents.&nbsp; Of course there are countless varieties out there and a plethora of machine doubling but I&#039;m using the Redbook as the baseline as these are the &quot;big&quot; ones that are significant enough to be included in their lists and thus become kinda &quot;the norm&quot; when talking about DD&#039;s.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Other than the lone 74d Kennedy, they are all found in cents.&nbsp; Is it entirely randomness and coincidence or is there a technical reason why cents would be more prone to this error?</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Cents:&nbsp; </b>1969s, 1971 and 1971s proof, 1972, 1983 reverse, 1995</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Nickels: </b>none</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Dimes: </b>none</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Quarters: </b>none</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Halves: </b>1974d</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Dollars: </b>none[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in