Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jaelus, post: 2755063, member: 46237&quot;]I disagree with this. For classic gold, a 62 may be a very nice grade. Also, a 62 may be given to a 64/65 that has one small patch of light hairlines, but that coin may look like a gem without closer scrutiny. A 62 (or even a 61) may also be given to a very nice coin with cabinet rub that they think deserves a higher market grade than a 58.</p><p><br /></p><p>Generally I think of 62 as being nice but somewhat baggy, or a nicer coin with a minor issue. An MS61 may also be a nicer coin with a minor issue, but usually will just be excessively baggy. MS60 seems to be reserved for ugly but technically uncirculated coins. I think the two main reasons you don&#039;t see MS60s as much are that people don&#039;t submit coins that are that unattractive unless they are real rarities, or coins that might get an MS60 get UNC Details instead.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in