Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2496833, member: 36230&quot;]Perhaps we are, but everything from simple misunderstandings to straight misinformation is very common in CAC threads, so care should be taken to avoid it and allow for educated decisions to be made.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And why would CAC buy TPG mistakes? You&#039;re deflecting away from the point which, in case you somehow missed it or are unfamiliar, is that the CAC sight-unseen policy is a &quot;guarantee&quot; unmatched by the TPGs and quashes your claim that they don&#039;t take the &quot;financial responsibility&quot; the TPGs do.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for dogs residing in TPG plastic; they chose to grade/certify to their own standards just as CAC does to theirs, but they don&#039;t/won&#039;t buy anything residing in their holders; CAC will with what they&#039;ve stickered. You can spin this however you wish as well, but it&#039;s the same thing... the TPGs didn&#039;t have to slab the dogs in the first place.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You really believe this?</p><p><br /></p><p>From a simple business standpoint, if a counterfeit had slipped by NGC/PCGS and later CAC, it would be in their best interest to get it off the market without expecting the TPGs to do it for them. Just think about it for a moment.... does it make any sense to you that an entity who stands behind their opinion to the level that CAC does, with everything they sticker, would balk at standing behind authenticity and without a doubt pass responsibility along? Simple self-interest and common sense damage control should suggest otherwise.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in