Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why do we see more gold coins for the later Roman periods than earlier?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4518351, member: 19463"]Is it just me or does anyone find it odd how many of these listings are without the name of an issuing authority? Were the quoted sales under a header that was not repeated for each coin? </p><p>Mine is quite like a Berk listing on that page that says the coin is African copying Honorius but many listings lack that much.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1119386[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>It is recorded that Theodosius II paid a huge tribute to the Huns in gold. The most common solidus of the period dates to the time of that payment but I have never heard if the payment was in the form of coined money or bars. It would be cool to have a coin that once belonged to Attila but I have no idea how much of the total gold minted that year would be required to add up to that payment. Another thing is that I see more gold coins of the late period that have been removed from use in jewelry (ancient or modern). I suspect many of those coins were spared melting because they were mounted. How long has it been since the coin market would pay only melt for solidi of no particular merit?</p><p> </p><p>Theodosius II solidus 443 AD, 4.2g (about $215 melt today?) ex. jewelry</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1119391[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4518351, member: 19463"]Is it just me or does anyone find it odd how many of these listings are without the name of an issuing authority? Were the quoted sales under a header that was not repeated for each coin? Mine is quite like a Berk listing on that page that says the coin is African copying Honorius but many listings lack that much. [ATTACH=full]1119386[/ATTACH] It is recorded that Theodosius II paid a huge tribute to the Huns in gold. The most common solidus of the period dates to the time of that payment but I have never heard if the payment was in the form of coined money or bars. It would be cool to have a coin that once belonged to Attila but I have no idea how much of the total gold minted that year would be required to add up to that payment. Another thing is that I see more gold coins of the late period that have been removed from use in jewelry (ancient or modern). I suspect many of those coins were spared melting because they were mounted. How long has it been since the coin market would pay only melt for solidi of no particular merit? Theodosius II solidus 443 AD, 4.2g (about $215 melt today?) ex. jewelry [ATTACH=full]1119391[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why do we see more gold coins for the later Roman periods than earlier?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...