Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why do we see more gold coins for the later Roman periods than earlier?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Magnus Maximus, post: 4517964, member: 73473"]Very good question! I’m afraid I don’t know the answer though.</p><p><br /></p><p>Late Roman silver is the red headed stepchild of the ancient numismatic world. Most designs are “boring” when compared to earlier denarii which puts people off. That said, they show the last gasps of sophisticated portraits before the collapse of late antiquity in the 400’s.</p><p> </p><p>It should be said though that late Roman silver coins are very pure, with most siliqua well above 95% silver. I’ve heard some theories that silver coins at the time were used by weight rather than individual coins. I don’t know if I believe that, but it’s certainly food for thought. I read somewhere(I can’t remeber where) that an average comitatensis received about 2 Siliqua per day, so that should give us an idea about how much these coins were worth.</p><p>Here was my latest Siliqua purchase :</p><p><br /></p><p>Magnus Maximus</p><p>AR Siliqua</p><p>383-388 CE</p><p><br /></p><p>1.96 grams</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1119283[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1119284[/ATTACH]</p><p>I have 3 coins with the same obverse die match. See</p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/magnus-maximus-siliqua-3-0.352421/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/magnus-maximus-siliqua-3-0.352421/">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/magnus-maximus-siliqua-3-0.352421/</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Magnus Maximus, post: 4517964, member: 73473"]Very good question! I’m afraid I don’t know the answer though. Late Roman silver is the red headed stepchild of the ancient numismatic world. Most designs are “boring” when compared to earlier denarii which puts people off. That said, they show the last gasps of sophisticated portraits before the collapse of late antiquity in the 400’s. It should be said though that late Roman silver coins are very pure, with most siliqua well above 95% silver. I’ve heard some theories that silver coins at the time were used by weight rather than individual coins. I don’t know if I believe that, but it’s certainly food for thought. I read somewhere(I can’t remeber where) that an average comitatensis received about 2 Siliqua per day, so that should give us an idea about how much these coins were worth. Here was my latest Siliqua purchase : Magnus Maximus AR Siliqua 383-388 CE 1.96 grams [ATTACH=full]1119283[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1119284[/ATTACH] I have 3 coins with the same obverse die match. See [URL]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/magnus-maximus-siliqua-3-0.352421/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why do we see more gold coins for the later Roman periods than earlier?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...