Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Why did NGC bag the coin as AT?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1090964, member: 15309"]And that original sealed mint packed mint or proof set could have been improperly stored to achieve the toning. In that case, they are problem coins just the same as an AT coin and deserved to get bagged</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That is correct. Judging toning is a game of incomplete information. It is much like poker in that regard. When viewing a toned coin, you analyze the toning and the indicators that you see in order to render your judgment. There are coins that are 50 to 1 to be naturally toned and there are also coins where the odds are 6 to 5 or even money. But just like in poker, every once in a while that 50 to 1 shot will show up and be your proverbial two outer. I don't want people reading this to think that 1 of every 50 coins that are considered NT are actually the product of a coin doctor. The odds used here are poker odds along with the analogy to prove a point. The point is that the odds of finding an NT (on the scale) coin from a coin doctor or improper storage are far less than finding one in the Borderline QT/MA category where it really is a 50/50 guess about the originality of the toning. So maybe you are uncomfortable making an educated guess. You think that if you can't say definitevely 100% that the coin is AT or NT, then there is no reason to even try. And while you have your right to that opinion, all it really does is place you outside what is accepted by the numismatic community.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>They can't produce a written standard because they know that it is a moving target. The game of incomplete information will always change once new information is introduced. Everyone is entitled to their own standard, and personally, I think that is the standard that is really important. If I am uncomfortable with the originality of the toning on a coin, I will not buy it regardless if it resides in a TPG slab. Having said that, it is the TPG standard that affects the prices of these coins and an understanding of their criteria is essential with regards to financial prudence.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>You mean like when any given coin is examined by a group of people, including the graders, you get varying opinions of if the coin is MS64 or MS65. And that is also why the very same coin is MS64 on time and MS65 the next time.</p><p><br /></p><p>I finally figured you out Doug. It is not the TPG's and their practices that you hate, it is subjectivity. You live in a world where everything is black & white, right or wrong, good or bad. It explains why we disagree about almost every topic that includes a TPG opinion which will always be inherently subjective.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1090964, member: 15309"]And that original sealed mint packed mint or proof set could have been improperly stored to achieve the toning. In that case, they are problem coins just the same as an AT coin and deserved to get bagged That is correct. Judging toning is a game of incomplete information. It is much like poker in that regard. When viewing a toned coin, you analyze the toning and the indicators that you see in order to render your judgment. There are coins that are 50 to 1 to be naturally toned and there are also coins where the odds are 6 to 5 or even money. But just like in poker, every once in a while that 50 to 1 shot will show up and be your proverbial two outer. I don't want people reading this to think that 1 of every 50 coins that are considered NT are actually the product of a coin doctor. The odds used here are poker odds along with the analogy to prove a point. The point is that the odds of finding an NT (on the scale) coin from a coin doctor or improper storage are far less than finding one in the Borderline QT/MA category where it really is a 50/50 guess about the originality of the toning. So maybe you are uncomfortable making an educated guess. You think that if you can't say definitevely 100% that the coin is AT or NT, then there is no reason to even try. And while you have your right to that opinion, all it really does is place you outside what is accepted by the numismatic community. They can't produce a written standard because they know that it is a moving target. The game of incomplete information will always change once new information is introduced. Everyone is entitled to their own standard, and personally, I think that is the standard that is really important. If I am uncomfortable with the originality of the toning on a coin, I will not buy it regardless if it resides in a TPG slab. Having said that, it is the TPG standard that affects the prices of these coins and an understanding of their criteria is essential with regards to financial prudence. You mean like when any given coin is examined by a group of people, including the graders, you get varying opinions of if the coin is MS64 or MS65. And that is also why the very same coin is MS64 on time and MS65 the next time. I finally figured you out Doug. It is not the TPG's and their practices that you hate, it is subjectivity. You live in a world where everything is black & white, right or wrong, good or bad. It explains why we disagree about almost every topic that includes a TPG opinion which will always be inherently subjective.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Why did NGC bag the coin as AT?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...