Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;EyeEatWheaties, post: 1088739, member: 26972&quot;]why does AT vs NT&nbsp; bug me so much... ????&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I guess i can&#039;t, nor will I ever subscribe to the notion that there is a difference. a chemical reaction is a chemical reaction.&nbsp; Whether someone puts a coin in an album unknowing that it would turn the coin colors, is not any different than someone who puts a coin in an album KNOWING that it will turn colors.&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>When the grading services try and determine ethics........&nbsp; based on intent....&nbsp;&nbsp; to colorize a coin...&nbsp;&nbsp; It&#039;s just plain dumb...&nbsp; no it&#039;s stupid.......&nbsp; &nbsp; I can&#039;t for the life of me figure out why they don&#039;t - didn&#039;t just grade them all with environmental damage, or factor thier opinion of toning as just one more characteristic of determining a grade.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>If they would just accept all coins toned for what they are and grade them accordingly..... The market would then be flooded with them and that would be end of people paying moon money for coins from accidental or intentional chemistry experiments.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in