Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2570646, member: 19165&quot;]Let me rephrase: I have submitted about a dozen ANACS holders to NGC for crossover. Some came back the same, some came back less, and one came back higher. I&#039;ve been around long enough, and I&#039;ve viewed enough of these slabs, to know what I&#039;m talking about. Old ANACS, with the soapbar holders, was fairly consistent and reasonably accurate - modern ANACS is a joke. </p><p><br /></p><p>The market has also made their determination - if you compare the average ANACS to the average NGC/PCGS, you&#039;ll notice a definite and significant discount in the ANACS slabs. Now, if a collector knows how to accurately and confidently grade coins, and has the opportunity to cherrypick, they can get really good deals by sifting through the ANACS pile. But on average, ANACS is looser and inconsistent. ICG is so far off that they are an afterthought.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in