Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jim Robinson, post: 2570195, member: 117134&quot;]Another great anomaly!&nbsp; Why is it that ICG and Anacs proof slabs, especially with cameo designations, are almost never graded correctly? Or are they? Could it simply be a stigma or snubbing?&nbsp; Is it on purpose?</p><p>Don&#039;t get me wrong plenty of horribly overgraded proofs by these two exist.&nbsp;&nbsp; But what gives?&nbsp; These companies have very well respected and competent principals.&nbsp; They certainly have the skill set to grade these right.&nbsp;&nbsp; is it their business plan to overgrade?&nbsp; Is it their niche?&nbsp; Has to be. right?&nbsp; &quot;People prefer high grades to lower ones.&quot;&nbsp; &quot;Let&#039;s go with the high ones make everyone happy!&quot;&nbsp; Gee whiz, could that be the model?</p><p>Certainly they should be able to model their standards to the top tier companies.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Has anyone had a successful crossover of a modern 1950-1970 cameo that originated in slabs from these two?</p><p><br /></p><p>Thoughts?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in