Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why arent Nero coins more valuable?>
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 3212125, member: 56859"]I suspect the answer is much simpler: Nero's coins are abundant. There are enough to meet the demands of collectors and ancient coin "tourists". I wouldn't call them inexpensive though... at least not for the desirable types, well struck and in high states of preservation. The more mundane designs and coins in lesser states of preservation are among the better bargains when it comes to owning an interesting piece of history, at least in my opinion.</p><p><br /></p><p>Look at ACsearch using the general search term of "Nero". Of course this is going to include coins which have sold more than once, some coins of Poppaea and others related to Nero, and instances in which Nero is mentioned in the accompanying attribution or writeup but it's a good way to get a rough overview of market volume over the last couple of decades. You can do such a search for each emperor. Here's a sampling:</p><p><br /></p><p>Tiberius: 21,264</p><p>Caligula: 7,679</p><p>Claudius: 20,066</p><p>Nero: 21,936</p><p>Galba: 5,531</p><p>Otho: 3,171</p><p>Vitellius: 4,235</p><p>Vespasian: 19,781</p><p>Titus: 12,270</p><p>Domitian: 15,946 (Gosh, I would have guessed higher! We see a disproportionate number here on CoinTalk--- looking at you, [USER=82616]@David Atherton[/USER] <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />)</p><p>Nerva: 10,735</p><p>Trajan: 38,229</p><p>Hadrian: 32,371</p><p>Antoninus Pius: 23,445</p><p>...etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>These numbers reflect coins which have come to auction via a particular sampling of auction houses. It does not reflect coins sold privately, through online stores, brick and mortar shops, at coin shows, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a coin because this thread needs some pictures <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/neroannonaceressestertius-rt-jpg.778380/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>Nero</b></p><p>struck in Rome, CE 63</p><p>Orichalcum sestertius, 34 mm, 26.7 gm</p><p>Obv: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM P M TR P IMP PP; laureate head right, wearing aegis</p><p>Rev: ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES; Ceres, veiled and draped, seated left, holding corn ears and torch, her feet on stool, facing Annona standing right, holding cornucopia; between them, modius on garlanded altar; in background, stern of ship</p><p>Ref: RIC 98. Cohen 24[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 3212125, member: 56859"]I suspect the answer is much simpler: Nero's coins are abundant. There are enough to meet the demands of collectors and ancient coin "tourists". I wouldn't call them inexpensive though... at least not for the desirable types, well struck and in high states of preservation. The more mundane designs and coins in lesser states of preservation are among the better bargains when it comes to owning an interesting piece of history, at least in my opinion. Look at ACsearch using the general search term of "Nero". Of course this is going to include coins which have sold more than once, some coins of Poppaea and others related to Nero, and instances in which Nero is mentioned in the accompanying attribution or writeup but it's a good way to get a rough overview of market volume over the last couple of decades. You can do such a search for each emperor. Here's a sampling: Tiberius: 21,264 Caligula: 7,679 Claudius: 20,066 Nero: 21,936 Galba: 5,531 Otho: 3,171 Vitellius: 4,235 Vespasian: 19,781 Titus: 12,270 Domitian: 15,946 (Gosh, I would have guessed higher! We see a disproportionate number here on CoinTalk--- looking at you, [USER=82616]@David Atherton[/USER] :D) Nerva: 10,735 Trajan: 38,229 Hadrian: 32,371 Antoninus Pius: 23,445 ...etc. These numbers reflect coins which have come to auction via a particular sampling of auction houses. It does not reflect coins sold privately, through online stores, brick and mortar shops, at coin shows, etc. Here's a coin because this thread needs some pictures :) [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/neroannonaceressestertius-rt-jpg.778380/[/IMG] [B]Nero[/B] struck in Rome, CE 63 Orichalcum sestertius, 34 mm, 26.7 gm Obv: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM P M TR P IMP PP; laureate head right, wearing aegis Rev: ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES; Ceres, veiled and draped, seated left, holding corn ears and torch, her feet on stool, facing Annona standing right, holding cornucopia; between them, modius on garlanded altar; in background, stern of ship Ref: RIC 98. Cohen 24[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Why arent Nero coins more valuable?>
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...