Why are toned coins so popular?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by sakata, Apr 1, 2017.

  1. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    could be natural
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    No. It's a picture, and not even close to the most fake toning. Not even saying that it's fake, could be fine very easily. To many people think they can tell what toning is what.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  4. deefree

    deefree Active Member

    I've seen proofs look like that...Could be AT I guess...not sure since I don't have a lot of experience with Jefferson nickels.
    Those are pretty colors anyway!
     
  5. D-Train

    D-Train proof coin enthusiast

    It just looks too unnatural to me. Why would one part be gold and another part purple? Should the colors be more consistent? It looks like one edge was dipped in purple stain and another edge in gold stain. But like I said, I'm hardly an expert, but it's not something I would feel good about buying. If anyone is interested it's eBay auction is ending in about 20 minutes, it's only $4.80 right now.
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/1962-AWESOM...Gold-Purple-Blue-Tone-13-NO-RES-/232312626045
     
  6. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Why are you making definitive statements trying to trash something then?
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    No, it isn't. Jefferson Proofs from the '60s and the '70s, but especially the '60s, are well known, and have been for decades, for toning just like that. They are so common they even have a name, they are called "neons". I myself once bought a lot (as in a group of coins) of 120 of them. I gave many of them away to various friends, family, and several members of this forum. The rest I sold when I eventually sold my entire collection.

    Here's a picture of one. They come in all different colors and combinations of colors.


    1962jeff_neon1 obv.jpg 1962jeff_neon1.jpg
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    No. It is quite common for coins to tone various colors, in fact it is almost expected. While there are examples of coins that tone monochromatic, those that do are the exception to the rule.

    Here is a picture of Buff that I bought as a gift for a friend of mine once.

    1913d_buffalo obv.jpg 1913d_buffalo rev.jpg
     
    Seattlite86, Paul M., Paddy54 and 2 others like this.
  9. deefree

    deefree Active Member

    very nice Buff!
     
    spirityoda likes this.
  10. ValpoBeginner

    ValpoBeginner Well Known Supporter

    I went searching through some cents today, just accumulated pocket change, looking for some modern toners. Here's what I found.

    magnifier_20170507_131002-01.jpeg
    magnifier_20170507_131401-01.jpeg

    Is it just me or is it weird that they all are 1982 P or D. None of the other dates showed tone. Tarnish, yes, tone, no.
     
    Paul M. and jester3681 like this.
  11. ValpoBeginner

    ValpoBeginner Well Known Supporter

    These are my uncirculated '82s. 1494182686169895980171.jpg
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  12. ValpoBeginner

    ValpoBeginner Well Known Supporter

    And, no I do not wear sulfur ladden pants. They came to me that way.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  13. ValpoBeginner

    ValpoBeginner Well Known Supporter

    I read a book that in the 70's collectors frowned upon toned coins, and preferred blast white coins to all other coins. I personally like the sulfur toning my coins develop over time. I don't try to speed it up though, I can usually tell an AT coin from one that ages gracefully over time.
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Tarnish and toning are just different words for exactly the same thing.
     
  15. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    On some days, the source of the hydrogen sulfide can be inside your pants.
     
    Paul M., ValpoBeginner and Kentucky like this.
  16. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    1962 in particular was a hotbed of toned proof nickels. 1961 was of a different typical color and less intense.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  17. Kentucky

    Kentucky Well-Known Member

    Please don't mention @GDJMSP and Buff in the same context...Brrrrrrrrrrrrrr :shame:
     
  18. Kentucky

    Kentucky Well-Known Member

    Stay away from the pickled eggs, Kurt.
     
  19. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Both years were pretty darn good. 1963 and 1964 weren't bad either, although 1963 is a little stingier.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  20. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Never heard them called neons but I can see why....I always called them cotton candy as they have a more of a pastel color sort of like the colors of cotton candies... pinks,blues,greens....they all were for the most part a lite toned rainbow like pastel colors. IMHO some of the nicest colors on a toned coin.
     
  21. ValpoBeginner

    ValpoBeginner Well Known Supporter

    My one 61 Proof has the beginnings of toning. magnifier_20170507_174348.png
    The other does not...
    magnifier_20170507_175125.png
     
    Paul M. likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page