Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BadThad, post: 952787, member: 17261&quot;]This is a constant source of debate on the forums. Just seach NT or AT and you&#039;ll find a bomb load of threads discussing your points. To me it&#039;s beating a dead horse. There&#039;s better terms for toning IMO than just NT or AT. I like:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>1) Unintentional toning (old toning, natual progression, market acceptable) </p><p>2) Intentional toning (exposure to hydrogen sulfide or other agents, may be market acceptable)</p><p>3) Obvious intentional toning (not market acceptable, i.e. ebay rainbow sellers)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in