Who won that Bahram II today?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by ernstk, Sep 15, 2020.

  1. ernstk

    ernstk Active Member

    Yes
     
    cmezner likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. fomovore

    fomovore Active Member

    @ernstk
    I'm quite sure this vitriol is unwarranted. It's not like you _deserve_ to win an auction just by wanting the coin. You deserve to win by spending money. Cruel, cruel world, I know...

    PS. And I'm saying that as someone who thinks very hard before spending more than $200.
     
    DonnaML and +VGO.DVCKS like this.
  4. +VGO.DVCKS

    +VGO.DVCKS Well-Known Member

    Thank you, @fomovore, for your valued perspective. Some of us took most of our lives to get as far as $200.
    To paraphrase an old American advertisment, 'The Disease Is Entitlement. The Answer Is ...for one, Growing (expl. del.) Up.'
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2020
    DonnaML likes this.
  5. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Eh, not just Bahram II has been faked. Its not a unique coin. At some point, you have to rely on researchers and published collections. The SNS series has some of the most authoritative authors of it, using extensive collections. If it is published in this series, I would trust it. Same with Gobl. Unfortunately Gobl's Sassanian book is not nearly as thorough as his Hunnic series.
     
    Pellinore likes this.
  6. ernstk

    ernstk Active Member

    Yes I trust SNS but a forger can create a die transfer fake which would match SNS examples exactly then how would you know? The recent sasanian fakes are quite good. Here is one of such very good fake I would be easily fool by this but have no doubt it is a fake. That is why I care and pay for provenance because 20 years ago fakes were not that advanced like this.

    IMG-20200916-WA0000.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page