Who wants fakes ?

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Rudi Smits, Apr 20, 2013.

  1. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    PCGS doesn't grade or authenticate ancients, that I know of.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Slabbed ancients are a real mixed bag. Your regularly see ancients slabbed by some of the larger agencies where the description and attribution is completely wrong, even down to being the wrong emperor. Grading is even more varied. If I buy a slabbed ancient I generally free it from the slab.
    Martin
     
  4. Atarian

    Atarian Well-Known Member

    Well that shows how little I know about ancients. I was just thinking - it's a world coin, right?

    I've seen some in NGC slabs - no guarantee there either? If not, I'm just asking to get ripped off!
     
  5. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    NGC does, but as Martin mentioned, it's a roll of the dice.
     
  6. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    I will say that the one thing that looks the most fake among those fakes is the patina. I'm not saying natural desert patinas can't look like those artificially-weathered coins, but I'm not sure you can fake the hard patinas that some bronzes get after centuries of handling and exposure to various elements.

    A lot of really good pieces have been coming out of Spain lately, and this sort of thing makes me wonder whether there isn't an ancient coin factory going on there.
     
  7. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    this is one factors that keeps me shopping in the bargain bin, i have one coin i strongly suspect is a fake...but i paid 2.50 for it, so.........whatever.
     
  8. shanhartzell

    shanhartzell Member

    I have some nice ancients I bought out of the UK but as uncleaned coins. I cleaned them myself and enjoy these. I did buy one off the Bay last year and the patina and just about everything with the coin looked odd, I think I now know why.............:eek:
     
  9. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    Share the images. You are most probably correct, but you never know.
     
  10. shanhartzell

    shanhartzell Member

    1-DSC07336.jpg 1-DSC07338.jpg
    Ok, these represent mostly what I bought and cleaned. Paid $2.50 each for 25 oncleaned coins. These the seller said came out of Romania.:yes:
     
  11. shanhartzell

    shanhartzell Member

    1-DSC07341.jpg 1-DSC07344.jpg
    Bing, here is the one off the Bay. It was atributted to Constantins ? 337 - 361 A.D.:D
     
  12. Rudi Smits

    Rudi Smits Member

    they all look genuine to me...
     
  13. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I'm with Rudi on this. Genuine. Even the one of Ebay. I don't have time to ID it at the moment, but when I return I will if no one else has.
     
  14. IdesOfMarch01

    IdesOfMarch01 Well-Known Member

    A legitimate argument can be made for creating replicas of ancient coins, as long as such replicas are clearly labeled as such. For historical, teaching, and other reasons, replicas can serve a useful purpose in place of genuine ancients.

    However, a replica of an ancient bronze, per se, would be created to show the original bronze/orichalcum color that the original coin would have shown when it was in use. During its period of circulation, even a worn bronze would very likely have retained the original color of the metal, since the circulation and wearing of the coin would not have permitted large amounts of green or brown oxidation that aged, out-of-circulation AEs show. If your intention was to make a true replica, why would you artificially tone it so that it didn't resemble the coin that would have come from the ancient mint?

    Thus, it seems obvious that the artificial toning of the bronzes in these "replicas" can only be intended to fool the purchaser into thinking that the coin might be authentic. A "replica" of a bronze should be bronze, not toned as if it's been out of circulation for thousands of years. At best, this seller is being disingenuous, but more likely he's being purposely deceptive and misleading about the coins that he's selling.
     
    Carthago likes this.
  15. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    agreed!

    Go for it.

    :)
     
  16. Bill in Burl

    Bill in Burl Collector

    I have no problem with people making "replicas" of ancients, as long as "copy" or "replica" is molded as part of the die or casting. However, I DO have a problem with those that just can be "stamped" or "punched" as copy or replica ... those kind can be bought from the maker without the punches or stamps. Honest replicas are sold for education or having something that can't be purchased otherwise. What started this thread off was someone selling both coins and dies with the intention of misleading the purchaser or could end up that way. This has nothing to do with counterfeiting, but has clearly been classified as "fraud" both in the US and Canada .. and probably every other civilized Western country.
     
  17. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    The optimum word Bill in Burl is civilized. These came out of Spain which really shocks me, but I will not buy anything out of some Eastern European countries. NOTHING. I've been burned before.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page