Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Who is your favorite Roman Emperor
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Drusus, post: 425956, member: 6370"]I think its one of the more interesting times, pivotal even. Maximinus is an intriguing story, he never set foot in Rome during his rule, he spent all his time fighting. With the death of Severus Alexander and the rise of the somewhat obscure soldiers soldier, Maximinus, the Thracian, barbarian, consummate soldier...you see the real switch over from the principate which had been faltering for some time, and the final switch over with power resting almost completely in the military. Rome had always been about the military, even more so now, the senate was weak, the military was getting to the stage they no longer felt the need to even pretend to care what the senate might want. </p><p> </p><p>Balbinus and Pupienus were killed by their men, they had been the senatorial class attempt at taking imperial power, it failed...the military could use Gordian (13 years old) for his name and as a figurehead. Eventually more and more men like Maximinus stepped up willing to rule, like Maximinus they did not need the senates approval, even for show, nor did they need a figurehead...the empire became spoils of civil war, few men gained the office without fighting for it and almost all emperors were generals. Because there were constant threats to the empire from outside, they were fighting and the army wanted an emperor that could fight...and because there was always someone else who wanted the office and there was never any real rules to who became emperor next, they were fighting within the ranks all the time.</p><p> </p><p>I think Gordian was an attempt at keeping the appearance of a principate while in reality it was a compromise that allowed the senate to retain its say in civil affairs while the military did as they saw fit, all behind the scenes with the face and name of a Gordian to give to the people....instead of a so called barbarian.</p><p> </p><p>But I dont think a young kid of 13, regardless of his name, could have asserted authority in this environment. He owed his position to greater powers. I think maybe as he approached his twentieth birthday, he might have thought he could, and maybe thats why he died and a guy named Philip the Arab took power <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Pedigree gave way to military creditials...the army wanted an emperor they could relate to, not a spoiled prince.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Drusus, post: 425956, member: 6370"]I think its one of the more interesting times, pivotal even. Maximinus is an intriguing story, he never set foot in Rome during his rule, he spent all his time fighting. With the death of Severus Alexander and the rise of the somewhat obscure soldiers soldier, Maximinus, the Thracian, barbarian, consummate soldier...you see the real switch over from the principate which had been faltering for some time, and the final switch over with power resting almost completely in the military. Rome had always been about the military, even more so now, the senate was weak, the military was getting to the stage they no longer felt the need to even pretend to care what the senate might want. Balbinus and Pupienus were killed by their men, they had been the senatorial class attempt at taking imperial power, it failed...the military could use Gordian (13 years old) for his name and as a figurehead. Eventually more and more men like Maximinus stepped up willing to rule, like Maximinus they did not need the senates approval, even for show, nor did they need a figurehead...the empire became spoils of civil war, few men gained the office without fighting for it and almost all emperors were generals. Because there were constant threats to the empire from outside, they were fighting and the army wanted an emperor that could fight...and because there was always someone else who wanted the office and there was never any real rules to who became emperor next, they were fighting within the ranks all the time. I think Gordian was an attempt at keeping the appearance of a principate while in reality it was a compromise that allowed the senate to retain its say in civil affairs while the military did as they saw fit, all behind the scenes with the face and name of a Gordian to give to the people....instead of a so called barbarian. But I dont think a young kid of 13, regardless of his name, could have asserted authority in this environment. He owed his position to greater powers. I think maybe as he approached his twentieth birthday, he might have thought he could, and maybe thats why he died and a guy named Philip the Arab took power :) Pedigree gave way to military creditials...the army wanted an emperor they could relate to, not a spoiled prince.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Who is your favorite Roman Emperor
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...