Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MorganFred, post: 28272, member: 1779&quot;]I just FTPed to my own website scans of the obverse and reverse of the possible problem Morgan (I still haven&#039;t figured out how to attach or embed an image here, but this seems easier anyway). I used 400dpi, so the files and images are large (about 155kb each, compressed), but you can see it up close and personal. For comparison, I side-by-side scanned an 1884-CC MS-61 slabbed by PCGS which DOES cartwheel nicely and normally. It may not be a fair comparison since I&#039;m scanning through the slab. BTW, while scanning, I noticed the reverse of the 1890-CC cartwheels much better than, and in marked contrast to the obverse. </p><p><br /></p><p>I dunno. Too close for me to call. Maybe PCGS won&#039;t body-bag it. (And maybe someone will buy that bridge I&#039;ve been trying to peddle for years.)</p><p><br /></p><p>I guess I also wonder why anyone would dip or otherwise try to mess with what was once a beautiful coin.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://homepage.mac.com/k2frd/1890CCobv.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://homepage.mac.com/k2frd/1890CCobv.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://homepage.mac.com/k2frd/1890CCobv.jpg</a></p><p><a href="http://homepage.mac.com/k2frd/1890CCrev.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://homepage.mac.com/k2frd/1890CCrev.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://homepage.mac.com/k2frd/1890CCrev.jpg</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Comments and opinions much appreciated.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks!</p><p><br /></p><p>Fred[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in