Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;princeofwaldo, post: 1359055, member: 24091&quot;]Agree, the obverse fields on the 58 are nothing short of sensational. A few trivial marks on the cheek... The reverse isn&#039;t quite as nice, but the generally held consensus is that the obverse should be weighted at 60% when grading which suggests to me the coin is severly undergraded.</p><p><br /></p><p>Check-out the NGC photos of the coin...,,</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.ngccoin.com/certlookup/CertResults.aspx?CertNumber=3432206-009" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.ngccoin.com/certlookup/CertResults.aspx?CertNumber=3432206-009" rel="nofollow">http://www.ngccoin.com/certlookup/CertResults.aspx?CertNumber=3432206-009</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Be sure to look at the rest of the coins in this particular NGC submission, they pretty much body-bagged nearly every coin in the submission with NET grades, this was one of the few that actually got an un-impaired grade. Who ever sent these coins in must have flipped-out when they got them back. Kind of hard to believe NFC would have bothered sending these in if they were cleaned and otherwise had problems.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in